Skip to content
Marlbridge

AP® Calculus BC · Unit 10 · Topic 10.6

Comparison Tests for Convergence: Practice Questions (Calculus BC 10.6)

Seven original Marlbridge practice questions on the direct and limit comparison tests: valid directions, finding L, choosing benchmarks and writing full justifications, with rubrics.

These are original Marlbridge practice questions, not past exam questions. The rubrics are a suggested Marlbridge rubric to help you check your work; they are not an official scoring guideline. BC-only material. Assumptions: no calculator for any question; every sum runs from n = 1 to ∞ unless stated; e ≈ 2.718 and π/2 ≈ 1.571 where needed.

Question 1 (multiple choice · foundation)

Suppose 0 < aₙ ≤ bₙ for every n ≥ 1. Which statement must be true?

  • (A) If ∑ aₙ converges, then ∑ bₙ converges.
  • (B) If ∑ bₙ diverges, then ∑ aₙ diverges.
  • (C) If ∑ bₙ converges, then ∑ aₙ converges.
  • (D) If ∑ aₙ diverges, then ∑ bₙ converges.
Answer and explanation

Answer: (C). The partial sums of ∑ aₙ increase and are never bigger than those of ∑ bₙ. If ∑ bₙ converges, its sum is a ceiling for the partial sums of ∑ aₙ, so ∑ aₙ converges.

  • (A) is “bigger than convergent”. Example: aₙ = 1/n² and bₙ = 1/n. ∑ aₙ converges but ∑ bₙ diverges.
  • (B) is “smaller than divergent”. The same example shows ∑ bₙ can diverge while ∑ aₙ converges.
  • (D) is the opposite of what is true: if the smaller series diverges, the bigger one diverges too.

Question 2 (multiple choice · core)

A student applies the limit comparison test to ∑ (3n² + 1)/(n⁴ + 2n), using bₙ = 1/n². What is L = lim aₙ/bₙ, and what can be concluded?

  • (A) L = 3; the series converges.
  • (B) L = 3; the series diverges.
  • (C) L = 0; the series converges.
  • (D) L = 1/3; no conclusion is possible.
Answer and explanation

Answer: (A). aₙ/bₙ = n²(3n² + 1)/(n⁴ + 2n) = (3n⁴ + n²)/(n⁴ + 2n). Divide by n⁴: (3 + 1/n²)/(1 + 2/n³) → 3. Since 0 < 3 < ∞ and ∑ 1/n² converges (p = 2), the series converges. All terms are positive.

  • (B) has the right L but the wrong conclusion: the benchmark converges, so the series converges.
  • (C) comes from comparing with 1/n instead of 1/n² (that limit is 0). With L = 0 and a divergent benchmark, the basic test gives no conclusion anyway.
  • (D) computes bₙ/aₙ instead of aₙ/bₙ. Even so, 1/3 is finite and positive, so a conclusion would still follow; “no conclusion” is wrong either way.

Question 3 (multiple choice · core)

Each statement below is true for every n ≥ 1. Which one, together with what you know about the benchmark series, gives no conclusion about the series on the left?

  • (A) 1/(n³ + 2) < 1/n³
  • (B) 1/(n − 1/2) > 1/n
  • (C) 1/(n + 2) < 1/n
  • (D) (n + 1)/n² > 1/n
Answer and explanation

Answer: (C). ∑ 1/n diverges, and 1/(n + 2) is smaller. Smaller than divergent gives no information. (∑ 1/(n + 2) does diverge, but you need another reason, such as a shift of the index or limit comparison.)

  • (A) Smaller than the convergent ∑ 1/n³ (p = 3): ∑ 1/(n³ + 2) converges.
  • (B) Bigger than the divergent harmonic series: ∑ 1/(n − 1/2) diverges.
  • (D) (n + 1)/n² = 1/n + 1/n² > 1/n, bigger than divergent: the series diverges.

Question 4 (multiple choice · stretch)

Which of the following series converges?

  • (A) ∑ 1/(3n − 2)
  • (B) ∑ √n/(n + 4)
  • (C) ∑ n/(n³ + 5)
  • (D) ∑ (n² + 1)/(n³ + 1)
Answer and explanation

Answer: (C). Dominant terms n/n³ = 1/n². Limit comparison with 1/n²: n³/(n³ + 5) → 1, and ∑ 1/n² converges. (Direct comparison also works: n/(n³ + 5) < n/n³ = 1/n².)

  • (A) behaves like 1/(3n). Limit comparison with 1/n gives L = 1/3, so it diverges like the harmonic series.
  • (B) behaves like √n/n = 1/√n. Limit comparison with 1/√n gives L = 1, and p = 1/2 ≤ 1, so it diverges.
  • (D) behaves like n²/n³ = 1/n. Limit comparison with 1/n gives L = 1, so it diverges.

Question 5 (calculation · core)

Let aₙ = (2n + 5)/(n^(5/2) + 3).

(a) Use the limit comparison test to decide whether ∑ aₙ converges. (b) A student tries the direct comparison aₙ ≤ 2/n^(3/2). Show that this inequality is false for every n ≥ 2. (c) Give a direct comparison that does work.

Worked solution

(a) aₙ > 0 for all n ≥ 1. Dominant terms: 2n/n^(5/2) = 2/n^(3/2), so take bₙ = 1/n^(3/2). aₙ/bₙ = (2n + 5) n^(3/2)/(n^(5/2) + 3) = (2n^(5/2) + 5n^(3/2))/(n^(5/2) + 3). Divide by n^(5/2): (2 + 5/n)/(1 + 3/n^(5/2)) → 2. 0 < 2 < ∞ and ∑ 1/n^(3/2) converges (p = 3/2 > 1), so ∑ aₙ converges by the limit comparison test.

(b) Compare (2n + 5) n^(3/2) with 2(n^(5/2) + 3). Their difference is 2n^(5/2) + 5n^(3/2) − 2n^(5/2) − 6 = 5n^(3/2) − 6. For n ≥ 2, n^(3/2) ≥ 2√2 > 2, so 5n^(3/2) − 6 > 4 > 0. So aₙ > 2/n^(3/2) for every n ≥ 2: the inequality points the wrong way. (It does hold at n = 1, where a₁ = 7/4 < 2, but one term is not enough.)

(c) For n ≥ 1, 2n + 5 ≤ 2n + 5n = 7n, and n^(5/2) + 3 > n^(5/2). So 0 < aₙ < 7n/n^(5/2) = 7/n^(3/2). ∑ 7/n^(3/2) converges (constant multiple of p = 3/2), so ∑ aₙ converges by direct comparison.

Suggested mark points (5): 1 for the benchmark 1/n^(3/2); 1 for L = 2 with working; 1 for the conclusion with “0 < L < ∞” and the benchmark’s p stated; 1 for showing the difference 5n^(3/2) − 6 > 0 for n ≥ 2; 1 for a valid direct comparison with a convergent benchmark.

Question 6 (constructed response · core)

(a) Show that ∑ arctan(n)/n² converges. (b) Show that ∑ (1 + e^(−n))/n diverges. (c) Explain why the true inequality (1 + e^(−n))/n < 2/n does not help in part (b).

Worked solution and suggested Marlbridge rubric

(a) For n ≥ 1, π/4 ≤ arctan n < π/2, so every term is positive and 0 < arctan(n)/n² < (π/2)/n². ∑ (π/2)/n² is a constant multiple of the p-series with p = 2 > 1, so it converges. By the direct comparison test, ∑ arctan(n)/n² converges.

(b) e^(−n) > 0, so 1 + e^(−n) > 1 and (1 + e^(−n))/n > 1/n > 0 for every n ≥ 1. ∑ 1/n is the harmonic series, which diverges. By the direct comparison test, ∑ (1 + e^(−n))/n diverges.

(c) ∑ 2/n diverges (twice the harmonic series). A series whose terms are smaller than those of a divergent series could converge or diverge, so this comparison gives no conclusion.

Point What earns it
1 Bound 0 < arctan n < π/2 used to get aₙ < (π/2)/n²
1 Benchmark identified as convergent (p = 2) and conclusion by direct comparison
1 Inequality (1 + e^(−n))/n > 1/n with a reason (e^(−n) > 0)
1 Harmonic series named as divergent and conclusion by direct comparison
1 (c) explains that “smaller than divergent” gives no information

Total: 5 points. Acceptable alternative for (a) and (b): limit comparison with 1/n² (L = π/2) and with 1/n (L = 1). Each needs the limit with a reason, for example arctan n → π/2 and e^(−n) → 0.

Question 7 (constructed response · stretch)

Consider ∑ 2ⁿ/(3ⁿ − n).

(a) Explain why the direct comparison 2ⁿ/(3ⁿ − n) ≤ (2/3)ⁿ fails. (b) Use the limit comparison test with bₙ = (2/3)ⁿ to show that the series converges. You may use the fact that n/3ⁿ → 0. (c) Show that n ≤ ½ · 3ⁿ for every n ≥ 1. Deduce that 2ⁿ/(3ⁿ − n) ≤ 2(2/3)ⁿ, and hence find an upper bound for the sum of the series.

Worked solution and suggested Marlbridge rubric

(a) For n ≥ 1, 3ⁿ − n < 3ⁿ, so the denominator is smaller than 3ⁿ and the fraction is bigger: 2ⁿ/(3ⁿ − n) > (2/3)ⁿ. Bigger than a convergent series gives no conclusion. (For example, a₁ = 2/2 = 1 > 2/3.)

(b) 3ⁿ − n = 2, 7, 24, … is positive for n ≥ 1, so aₙ > 0; also bₙ > 0. aₙ/bₙ = [2ⁿ/(3ⁿ − n)] · [3ⁿ/2ⁿ] = 3ⁿ/(3ⁿ − n) = 1/(1 − n/3ⁿ) → 1/(1 − 0) = 1. 0 < 1 < ∞, and ∑ (2/3)ⁿ is geometric with |r| = 2/3 < 1, so it converges. By the limit comparison test, the series converges.

(c) At n = 1: 1 ≤ 3/2. When n increases by 1, the left side goes up by 1, while the right side triples, going up by 3ⁿ ≥ 3. So the inequality stays true for every n ≥ 1. Then 3ⁿ − n ≥ 3ⁿ − ½ · 3ⁿ = ½ · 3ⁿ, so aₙ ≤ 2ⁿ/(½ · 3ⁿ) = 2(2/3)ⁿ. ∑ from n = 1 of (2/3)ⁿ = (2/3)/(1 − 2/3) = 2, so the sum of the series is at most 2 × 2 = 4.

Point What earns it
1 (a) shows aₙ > (2/3)ⁿ and says bigger than convergent gives no conclusion
1 Correct ratio aₙ/bₙ = 3ⁿ/(3ⁿ − n), simplified
1 Limit 1 with a reason, conclusion with 0 < L < ∞ and the geometric benchmark justified
1 Valid argument that n ≤ ½ · 3ⁿ for all n ≥ 1, leading to aₙ ≤ 2(2/3)ⁿ
1 Geometric sum 2 and bound 4

Total: 5 points. Background: adding terms numerically gives a sum of about 2.51, which is below the bound of 4. Part (c) on its own is also a complete proof of convergence, by direct comparison.

How did you do?

  • Q1 or Q3 wrong: study Figure 1 (the four cases) in the study guide.
  • Q2 or Q5 wrong: rework the limit by dividing by the highest power; see Worked example 2.
  • Q4 wrong: reread “Choosing bₙ” and its table of dominant terms.
  • Q6 wrong: review the inequality tricks and Worked example 1.
  • Q7 wrong: compare with Worked example 3 (geometric benchmarks) and “Writing a complete justification”.

Then tick off the topic checklist.

AP® and Advanced Placement® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse, this website. Marlbridge is an independent tuition provider. It is not an authorized AP course provider, an AP school or an exam centre, and these resources are not official College Board materials. Reading them or doing simulations does not meet the laboratory requirement of an AP science course.