These are original Marlbridge practice questions, not past exam questions. The mark points are a suggested Marlbridge rubric to help you check your work; they are not an official scoring guideline. All places, businesses and data are fictional. Only addition, subtraction, multiplication and division are needed, so a four-function calculator is enough. Give elasticities to 2 decimal places unless they are exact.
Question 1 (multiple choice · foundation)
A group of households’ average income rises from $40,000 to $50,000 per year. The prices of goods do not change. The number of second-hand coats the group buys falls from 10 to 8 per year. Using the midpoint method, what is the income elasticity of demand, and what type of good are second-hand coats for this group?
- (A) −1.00; an inferior good
- (B) +1.00; a normal good
- (C) −0.80; an inferior good
- (D) −1.25; an inferior good
Answer and explanation
Answer: (A). % change in quantity = −2 ÷ 9 × 100 = −22.22%. % change in income = 10,000 ÷ 45,000 × 100 = 22.22%. YED = −22.22 ÷ 22.22 = −1.00. It is negative, so the coats are an inferior good for this group.
- (B) drops the minus sign. For YED the sign is the answer: a positive value would mean a normal good.
- (C) divides by the starting values (−20% ÷ 25%) instead of using the midpoint method.
- (D) uses starting values and puts income on top (25% ÷ −20%). Quantity always goes in the numerator.
Question 2 (multiple choice · core)
The cross-price elasticity of demand for good X with respect to the price of good Y is −0.6. Which statement is correct?
- (A) X and Y are complements, so a rise in the price of Y decreases the demand for X.
- (B) X and Y are substitutes, because the value is between −1 and 1.
- (C) X is an inferior good.
- (D) Demand for X is price inelastic, because the value is less than 1 in size.
Answer and explanation
Answer: (A). A negative XED means the price of Y and the quantity demanded of X move in opposite directions. That is the pattern for complements: when Y costs more, people buy less Y and so need less X. The demand curve for X shifts left.
- (B) uses the size instead of the sign. Whether goods are substitutes or complements depends on the sign; the size only shows how strong the link is.
- (C) mixes up cross-price and income elasticity. Only YED tells you whether a good is inferior.
- (D) mixes up cross-price and own-price elasticity. XED says nothing about how X’s quantity responds to X’s own price.
Question 3 (multiple choice · core)
In a fictional country, the price of rail tickets rises by 8%. At unchanged coach fares, the quantity of coach tickets demanded rises by 12%. What is the cross-price elasticity of demand for coach tickets with respect to the price of rail tickets?
- (A) +1.5; rail and coach tickets are substitutes
- (B) −1.5; rail and coach tickets are complements
- (C) +0.67; rail and coach tickets are substitutes
- (D) +1.5; rail and coach tickets are complements
Answer and explanation
Answer: (A). The percentages are given, so divide directly: XED = 12 ÷ 8 = +1.5. Rail’s price and the quantity of coach tickets move in the same direction, so XED is positive and the goods are substitutes.
- (B) gives a negative sign although both changes are increases.
- (C) puts the price change on top (8 ÷ 12). The quantity change belongs in the numerator.
- (D) has the right number but the wrong conclusion. Positive XED means substitutes, not complements.
Question 4 (calculation · core)
In Lowmere, a fictional region, average household income rises from $2,000 to $2,500 per month. Prices do not change. Monthly quantities bought by households in the region are:
| Good | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Gym memberships | 120 | 160 |
| Bus passes | 500 | 420 |
| Rice (kg) | 900 | 940 |
(a) Calculate the income elasticity of demand for each good, using the midpoint method. (b) Classify each good, and say which good’s demand is most responsive to income. (c) Income is expected to rise by a further 10%. Predict the percentage change in the quantity of gym memberships demanded at current prices.
Worked solution
(a) % change in income = 500 ÷ 2,250 × 100 = 22.22%.
| Good | % change in Q | YED |
|---|---|---|
| Gym memberships | 40 ÷ 140 × 100 = 28.57% | 28.57 ÷ 22.22 = +1.29 |
| Bus passes | −80 ÷ 460 × 100 = −17.39% | −17.39 ÷ 22.22 = −0.78 |
| Rice | 40 ÷ 920 × 100 = 4.35% | 4.35 ÷ 22.22 = +0.20 |
(b) Gym memberships: normal (positive). Bus passes: inferior (negative). Rice: normal (positive, but small). Gym memberships respond most: 1.29 is the largest value in size.
(c) % change in Q = YED × % change in income = 1.29 × 10 = about 12.9% more gym memberships.
Suggested mark points (3): 1 for the 22.22% income change and all three YEDs with signs; 1 for all three classifications based on the sign; 1 for about 12.9%.
Common error: comparing size and sign together. Bus passes (−0.78) are more responsive than rice (+0.20) even though −0.78 is the smaller number. Compare sizes to judge strength.
Question 5 (graph · core)
In Tarnby, a fictional city, the price of petrol rises by 15%. At current prices, 800 electric bicycles and 300 large petrol-powered cars are sold each month. The cross-price elasticity of demand with respect to the price of petrol is +0.4 for electric bicycles and −0.8 for large petrol-powered cars.
(a) Calculate the new quantity of each good demanded at current prices. (b) Draw two correctly labelled graphs, one for each market, showing the effect of the petrol price rise on demand. (c) Explain the direction of each shift, using the sign of the elasticity.
Model answer and suggested Marlbridge rubric
(a) Electric bicycles: 0.4 × 15 = +6%, so 800 × 1.06 = 848 per month. Large cars: −0.8 × 15 = −12%, so 300 × 0.88 = 264 per month.
(b) Each graph has “Price” on the vertical axis and “Quantity” (electric bicycles per month, or cars per month) on the horizontal axis, with a downward-sloping demand curve D₁. For electric bicycles, draw D₂ to the right of D₁. For large cars, draw D₂ to the left of D₁. Arrows show the direction of each shift. At the original price, D₂ should be at 848 bicycles and 264 cars.
(c) Electric bicycles have a positive XED: they are substitutes for driving a petrol car, so dearer petrol sends some travellers to electric bicycles and demand increases. Large cars have a negative XED: they are complements to petrol, because they cannot be used without it. Dearer petrol makes running one more expensive, so demand decreases.
| Point | What earns it |
|---|---|
| 1 | Both new quantities correct (848 and 264) |
| 1 | Both graphs fully labelled, with demand shifting right for electric bicycles and left for large cars |
| 1 | Positive XED linked to substitutes and an increase in demand |
| 1 | Negative XED linked to complements and a decrease in demand |
Do not award the second point for a movement along the demand curve: the own price of each good has not changed.
Question 6 (constructed response · core)
Inkwell, a fictional firm, sells printers at $120 and ink cartridges at $30. Each month it sells 20,000 printers and 50,000 cartridges. Its cartridges only fit its own printers. Inkwell cuts the price of its printers by 10%. The price elasticity of demand for its printers is −0.5, and the cross-price elasticity of demand for its cartridges with respect to the printer price is −1.2. The cartridge price does not change.
(a) Calculate the change in Inkwell’s monthly revenue from printers. (b) Calculate the new quantity of cartridges demanded and the change in cartridge revenue. (c) Explain why the price cut can make sense for Inkwell even though printer revenue changes as you found in (a). (d) A rival firm cuts the price of its own printers, which cannot use Inkwell cartridges. Would you expect the cross-price elasticity of demand for Inkwell cartridges with respect to the rival’s printer price to be positive or negative? Explain.
Model answer and suggested Marlbridge rubric
(a) New price = $120 × 0.9 = $108. Quantity rises by 0.5 × 10 = 5%, to 21,000. Revenue goes from $120 × 20,000 = $2,400,000 to $108 × 21,000 = $2,268,000: a fall of $132,000. Demand for printers is inelastic, so the price cut lowers printer revenue.
(b) % change in cartridges = −1.2 × (−10) = +12%, so 50,000 × 1.12 = 56,000 cartridges. Cartridge revenue goes from $30 × 50,000 = $1,500,000 to $30 × 56,000 = $1,680,000: a rise of $180,000.
(c) Printers and cartridges are complements (negative XED). Cheaper printers mean more printers in use, which raises demand for cartridges. The extra cartridge revenue ($180,000) is larger than the lost printer revenue ($132,000), so total revenue rises by $48,000 per month.
(d) Positive. If the rival’s printers get cheaper, some buyers choose them instead of Inkwell printers. Fewer Inkwell printers in use means fewer Inkwell cartridges are needed. So the rival’s price falls and the quantity of Inkwell cartridges falls: they move in the same direction, giving a positive XED. The rival’s printers are substitutes for Inkwell printers, and that link passes through to the cartridges.
| Point | What earns it |
|---|---|
| 1 | Printer revenue falls by $132,000, with working |
| 1 | 56,000 cartridges and a revenue rise of $180,000 |
| 1 | Net gain of $48,000 explained by the complement link |
| 1 | Positive XED in (d), with the chain: cheaper rival printers → fewer Inkwell printers → fewer cartridges |
Question 7 (explanation · stretch)
(a) Seabright, a fictional sports-drink maker, raises its monthly advertising spending from $20,000 to $30,000. At unchanged prices, its monthly sales rise from 4,000 to 4,400 crates. Calculate the elasticity of demand with respect to advertising, using the midpoint method, and interpret the value. (b) Explain why the sign must be kept when you report an income or cross-price elasticity, but is often dropped for price elasticity of demand. (c) A student says: “A good is either normal or inferior. It cannot be both.” Evaluate this claim with an example.
Model answer and suggested Marlbridge rubric
(a) % change in sales = 400 ÷ 4,200 × 100 = 9.52%. % change in advertising = 10,000 ÷ 25,000 × 100 = 40%. Elasticity = 9.52 ÷ 40 = 0.24. A 1% rise in advertising spending raises sales by about 0.24% at the same price. Demand responds, but by a much smaller percentage than the change in spending. Any determinant of demand can be measured this way.
(b) The law of demand means price elasticity of demand is always negative, so the sign adds no information and people often report the size only. Income and cross-price elasticities can be either positive or negative, and the sign carries the meaning: normal or inferior, substitutes or complements. Dropping it would turn one answer into its opposite.
(c) The claim is too strong. YED is measured over a range of incomes, and it can change sign as income changes. For example, a household on a very low income may buy more bus travel as its income rises (YED positive: normal), but once it is well off it may buy a car and use the bus less (YED negative: inferior). So a good can be normal over one income range and inferior over another, or for one group of buyers and not another. Over any one measured range, though, the sign gives one classification.
| Point | What earns it |
|---|---|
| 1 | 9.52%, 40% and 0.24 |
| 1 | Correct interpretation of 0.24 as a percentage response |
| 1 | PED always negative so its sign is uninformative; YED and XED signs carry the classification |
| 1 | Evaluates the claim: YED can change sign across income ranges or groups, with a plausible example |
How did you do?
- Q1, Q3 or Q4 calculations wrong: re-read “The midpoint method again” and Worked example 1 in the study guide. Quantity always goes on top.
- Q2 or Q6 wrong: re-read “Cross-price elasticity of demand” and Worked example 2. Check the sign before you classify.
- Q5 marked down: re-read Figures 1 and 2. A change in another good’s price shifts the curve.
- Q7 incomplete: re-read “Elasticity is a general idea” and the misconceptions.
Then tick off the topic checklist.