Design as part of the message
So far in Unit 7 you have looked at emphasis created by arrangement (Topic 7.4) and by punctuation (Topic 7.6). Writers have a third tool: design features. These are choices about how text looks on the page or screen: type style, size, layout and space. The course summarises the point briefly: some design features, such as italics or boldface, create emphasis.
It is easy to underrate design. A reader scanning a leaflet, a webpage or a notice does not read every word in order. Their eye goes first to what is large, bold, coloured, isolated or set in capitals. Writers who know this use design to make sure the most important idea is the one the reader sees first, or to guide the reader through the argument in a particular order.
A catalogue of design features
| Feature | What it does | Typical use | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Italics | A gentle stress; marks titles and foreign words | Stressing one word in a sentence (“It is not optional”) | Too many italics read as hysterical |
| Boldface | A strong visual stress that survives a skim | Key terms, deadlines, figures | If everything is bold, nothing is |
| CAPITALS | Loud; draws the eye | Short warnings, acronyms | Whole paragraphs in capitals are hard to read and sound like shouting |
| Underlining | Once common for emphasis; now often means a link | Rare in modern texts | Confusion with hyperlinks |
| Headings and subheadings | Organise, signal topic, create hierarchy | Guiding the reader through sections | Vague headings waste the position |
| Lists and bullets | Break material into parallel items | Instructions, benefits, evidence | Can flatten reasoning into fragments |
| White space | Isolates what it surrounds | A single sentence set apart | Too much space makes a text look thin |
| Size and colour | Create hierarchy at a glance | Titles, key figures, calls to act | Colour alone fails readers who cannot see it |
| Pull quotes | Repeat a striking phrase in large type | Magazine articles | May distort the original context |
The second column is the key one. Each feature creates a hierarchy, telling the reader what to notice first and what matters most.
Emphasis works by contrast
Emphasis is relative. A bold word stands out only because most words around it are not bold. If a whole paragraph is bold, the reader has no hierarchy to follow, and the formatting says nothing. The same holds for capitals and exclamation marks.
Design depends on audience and medium
A feature that suits one situation may undermine another.
- A public notice has to work in seconds for people walking past, so large type, capitals for the one essential fact, and plenty of white space are sensible.
- A newspaper op-ed uses a headline and subheading to hook readers, but its body text is mostly plain, because readers expect to follow an extended argument.
- An academic essay is read carefully, in sequence, so its design is restrained: paragraphs, perhaps headings in a long text, italics for titles, and little else. Emphasis comes from sentences, not typography.
- A website uses links, headings and short paragraphs because readers skim and jump.
In your own writing for the exam, the conventions of a timed essay apply. Clear paragraphs, correct punctuation and well-built sentences do the work, and heavy formatting is rarely needed. Check what your testing format allows before you plan to rely on any feature.
Design in an argument you are analysing
If a source you are reading contains design features, treat them as the writer’s choices. Ask:
- What is made prominent? (the biggest word, the bold figure, the heading)
- What is made less prominent? (small print, a caveat in a footnote)
- What path does the design guide the reader along? (headline, then image, then call to act)
- How does that serve the writer’s purpose for this audience?
Often the gap between what is prominent and what is hidden is the most revealing thing. A bold “50% OFF” with a conditional clause in small type tells you what the writer wants you to notice and what the writer hopes you will skip.
Worked example 1: analysing design features
Task. Explain how the design features in the notice below, written by Marlbridge, create emphasis and serve its purpose. (Described in text; bold and italics are as shown.)
LIBRARY CLOSED THIS SATURDAY (set as a large heading)
Because of electrical work, the library will be closed to visitors on Saturday 14 March.
Books due that day can be returned on Monday without a fine.
Online services remain available.
Questions? Ask at the desk.
Step 1: list the features. A large heading in capitals and bold; bold for the date and for “Questions?”; italics for the reassuring sentence about fines; short lines separated by white space.
Step 2: say what each makes prominent. The heading and the bolded date make the closure and date the first things a reader sees. The italics gently mark the sentence that removes the most likely worry (a fine) without competing with the heading. “Questions?” in bold invites the reader to ask, which supports the library’s helpful tone.
Step 3: say what the hierarchy suggests. The order of attention is: closure, date, reassurance, services, contact. That is the order in which a patron would need the information.
Step 4: link to purpose. The writer wants people to know quickly and not to be alarmed. Capitals and bold carry the urgent fact; italics and plain text soften the rest. The design and the content agree.
Worked example 2: judging and improving over-emphasis
Task. Evaluate the following flyer, written by Marlbridge, and improve its design.
JOIN THE SCHOOL CHOIR!!! NEW MEMBERS WANTED ALL YEARS WELCOME — rehearsals are on WEDNESDAYS at LUNCHTIME in ROOM 12, NO EXPERIENCE needed, BRING A FRIEND!!!
Step 1: diagnose. Almost every phrase is bold or in capitals, with triple exclamation marks and mixed styles. The reader cannot tell what matters most. The important facts (when and where) have the same weight as the slogan. The overall effect is shouting, and it may put off shy newcomers.
Step 2: decide what must be prominent. For a reader deciding whether to attend, the essential facts are what (choir), when (Wednesdays at lunchtime) and where (Room 12). The reassurance “no experience needed” should be easy to spot, since it removes a barrier.
Step 3: redesign.
Join the school choir (set as a large heading)
All years welcome. No experience needed.
Wednesdays, lunchtime, Room 12
Bring a friend.
Step 4: explain. One heading names the activity. One bold line gives the essential practical details, so it stands out. The reassurance sits in plain text immediately under the heading, short enough to read at a glance. Because only two things are emphasised, each is noticed.
Common misconceptions
- “More formatting means more emphasis.” It means less, because the contrast disappears.
- “Design is separate from the argument.” Design determines what a reader notices first, so it shapes the reading of the argument.
- “Capitals are the clearest way to emphasise.” They are the loudest, but long capital passages are harder to read than lower case.
- “Design analysis is just describing the look.” It must explain the effect on the audience and the link to purpose.
- “Every text has design features I can analyse.” In a plain page of prose, there may be little; do not invent features that are not there.
- “Italics always mean emphasis.” They also mark titles, foreign words and terms being mentioned, so check the context.
Where this leads
This is the last topic in Unit 7. Unit 8 shifts attention to the audience and to style, beginning with comparisons that relate to an audience in Topic 8.1. Practise now with the practice questions, use the revision notes and checklist, then take the Unit 7 diagnostic and the Unit 7 review. For the other ways emphasis is built, revisit the Topic 7.6 study guide.
Quick questions
Should I use bold or italics in my timed essay?
Rarely. Italics for titles and occasionally for a word you must stress are conventional, but clear sentences usually carry emphasis better than formatting. Follow the conventions of the format and the platform you write in.
Do design features count as part of the argument?
Yes, when they are part of the text. A heading that frames a claim or a bolded figure that directs the eye is a choice made to influence readers, so it is fair to analyse.
How do I write about design features without sounding like I am describing a poster?
Say what the feature makes prominent, how it guides the reader's attention, and why that serves the writer's purpose for this audience.