Place in Literary Texts (9675): Practice Questions

These are original questions written for Marlbridge, for revision and practice on this content, and do not reference any specific set text — apply the method below to your own studied prose text and poetry selection. They are not reproduced past-paper questions. Examination boards hold copyright in their own papers. Use these alongside the official past papers available free from your board.

Related: Place in Literary Texts study guide · Place in Literary Texts revision notes

---

Section A (practise using your studied prose text)

1. Explore how the writer uses a specific setting to represent ideas of social class or social identity in your studied text. [25]

2. “The natural world in this text represents more than a backdrop — it is central to the text’s meaning.” Discuss this view in relation to your studied prose text. [25]

Section B (practise using your studied poetry selection)

3. Comparing at least two poems from your studied selection, explore how the poet presents ideas of home and homeland. [25]

4. “Place, in poetry, is inseparable from memory.” Discuss this view in relation to at least two poems from your studied selection. [25]

---

Answers (worked approach — marks depend on your studied text and poems)

1. A top-band response identifies a specific setting and analyses the writer’s language in constructing it — imagery, structure, point of view — rather than simply describing the location; connects that setting explicitly to social class or identity, showing how the text positions characters within, or against, that place; and considers how the setting’s significance develops or shifts across the text, rather than treating it as static background. [25]

2. A strong essay engages critically with the claim rather than only agreeing or disagreeing; uses specific evidence of the natural world’s presence in the text — its beauty, its despoliation, or its symbolic function — analysing the writer’s language in representing it; and reaches a sustained, evidence-based judgement about whether and how far the natural world carries meaning beyond setting, ideally connecting this to the text’s wider concerns. [25]

3. A strong response selects genuinely comparable moments from at least two poems, rather than treating them separately; analyses the specific language, form and imagery each poem uses to construct home or homeland, showing how the poet’s method differs or develops across the selection; and reaches a comparative judgement — not just two single-poem analyses placed side by side — about how the poet’s treatment of home and homeland changes or stays consistent across the body of work. [25]

4. A strong essay engages critically with the claim, rather than treating it as self-evidently true or false; analyses at least two poems for specific evidence of place functioning as, or alongside, memory — imagery, tense, structure, direct statement — using close textual detail rather than general description; and reaches a reasoned judgement about whether the claim holds across the selection as a whole, or whether some poems resist it, showing awareness that a strong answer need not agree with the given statement to score well. [25]

Each question carries all 25 marks as a single response, and the notes above are indicative content, not a points scheme. OxfordAQA does not publish a Unit 2 mark scheme on its 9675 qualification page; the revised specification (Version 5.6, for exams from May/June 2028; section 5.5, Levels of response mark schemes) says the specification adopts a holistic approach to marking, with answers placed in bands on a best-fit basis, so use these notes to judge the quality of an argument rather than to count points.

---

How to adapt these questions to your own set texts

Because this resource deliberately does not name a specific prose text or poet’s selection, the most effective way to use it is to substitute your own studied text and poems into each question exactly as worded, then write a full timed response (roughly 55-60 minutes per question – the paper is 2 hours for two 25-mark questions, one per section, so the proportionate time is about sixty minutes each). Before writing a Section B response specifically, choose your comparison poems deliberately — select moments genuinely relevant to the question asked (home and homeland, or place and memory) rather than the two poems you happen to know best, since a comparison anchored to genuinely matching material is what the question actually rewards.

Where marks are usually lost

• Describing a setting without analysing the specific language used to construct it.
• Reducing “place” to physical geography, missing the specification’s broader angles of class, identity, politics, home and language.
• Writing a Section B answer from a single poem when the question asks for a comparison across the selection.
• Placing two poems’ analyses side by side without an explicit comparative judgement connecting them.
• Answering a given claim as a simple yes/no rather than a genuine discussion, missing what “discuss this view” actually asks for.
• Bringing an annotated copy of the set text into the open-book exam, which is not permitted — preparation should build an analytical framework in advance, not rely on searching the text from scratch.

Building an exam-ready evidence bank in advance

Because the exam is open book, the advantage is wasted if a candidate spends exam time searching for suitable passages under pressure. Prepare a short bank of key moments from both your prose text and your poetry selection well before the exam — each one briefly annotated with which “place” angle (geography, the natural world, social class, home and homeland, language) it best demonstrates, and for the poetry selection, which other poems in the set it could be compared against. Versatile evidence, capable of supporting more than one type of question, is more valuable revision material than evidence tied to a single predicted essay title, since the exact focus a question takes cannot be known in advance.

Why command words matter as much as content knowledge

“Explore” and “discuss this view” both invite genuinely analytical, argument-driven responses rather than descriptive summary of setting or one-sided assertion — a response that only describes a place, however accurately, will not reach the top band against either command word. Treat every practice question here as requiring a sustained critical argument, built from specific textual evidence and close attention to language, rather than a list of separate observations about where a text is set.