Skip to content
Marlbridge

Revision Notes

AQA A-level Psychology (7182): Paper 3 — Eating behaviour — Revision Notes

Condensed AQA 7182 eating behaviour notes: key terms, studies at a glance, anorexia and obesity explanations, an essay plan and a quick self-test.

Subject
Psychology
Level
A LEVELS
Topic
Paper 3 — Eating behaviour
Updated
Checked by
Marlbridge Academic Team, against the official specification, (what this means)

Aligned to AQA A Level Psychology (7182), Version 1.4 (1 September 2025), for teaching from September 2025. Official specification .

Syllabus page (what it covers and how it is assessed): AQA A Level Psychology.

Syllabus points this page covers

7182

  • 3 Issues and options in Psychology (whole topic)
  • 3.3.6 Eating behaviour

Found an error? Report a correction.

For full explanations and worked paragraphs, use the Eating behaviour study guide first.

These notes cover section 4.3.6 Eating behaviour of the AQA AS and A-level Psychology (7181, 7182) specification, Version 1.4 (1 September 2025), for teaching from September 2025. Eating behaviour sits in Option 2 with Schizophrenia and Stress. It is assessed in Section C of Paper 3: Issues and Options in Psychology (2 hours, 96 marks, 33.3% of the A-level), where you answer on one topic from Option 2 for 24 marks.

Find every unit on the AQA A-level Psychology hub, track progress with the 7182 checklist, and practise with the Eating behaviour practice questions.

Paper 3 rules in one box

  • Section A: Issues and debates in Psychology, compulsory, 24 marks.
  • Section B: one topic from Option 1 (Relationships, Gender, Cognition and development), 24 marks.
  • Section C: one topic from Option 2 (Schizophrenia, Eating behaviour, Stress), 24 marks.
  • Section D: one topic from Option 3 (Aggression, Forensic Psychology, Addiction), 24 marks.
  • Each section has multiple choice, short answer and extended writing questions.
  • Research methods, practical skills and maths skills are also assessed in Paper 3.

Key terms

Term Definition
Neophobia Reluctance to eat unfamiliar foods; thought to protect young children from toxins
Taste aversion Learned avoidance of a food after it has been followed by illness; can form after one pairing
Preparedness Biological readiness to learn some links (taste and illness) more easily than others
Lateral hypothalamus (LH) Area linked to starting eating in the dual-centre model
Ventromedial hypothalamus (VMH) Area linked to stopping eating (satiety) in the dual-centre model
Arcuate nucleus Part of the hypothalamus that receives hormone signals about hunger and energy stores
Ghrelin Hormone released mainly by the stomach when empty; increases hunger
Leptin Hormone released by fat tissue; signals satiety and reduces appetite
Leptin resistance The brain responds weakly to leptin despite high levels
Concordance The rate at which both members of a twin pair share a condition
Enmeshment Family members over-involved with weak boundaries between them
Autonomy Independence; the ability to make one’s own decisions
Modelling Imitating the behaviour of a role model
Vicarious reinforcement Learning from seeing another person rewarded
Cognitive distortion Biased or inaccurate thinking, such as seeing one’s body as larger than it is
Irrational belief An extreme, rigid belief, such as “any weight gain means failure”
Restraint A deliberate attempt to limit food intake
Disinhibition Breakdown of restraint, leading to overeating
Boundary model Intake is set by a hunger boundary and a satiety boundary, with a self-set diet boundary for dieters

Theories and studies at a glance

Who What Finding One evaluation point
Steiner (1979) Newborn facial reactions to tastes Positive to sweet, rejection to bitter Supports innate preferences, but adults learn to like bitter foods
Garcia and Koelling (1966) Rats: taste or light/sound paired with illness Taste-illness link learned easily; light/sound-illness not Shows preparedness; animal study, so generalise with care
Bernstein (1978) Children having chemotherapy given new ice cream Those who had it before nausea-causing treatment later avoided it Human evidence of taste aversion; real-world application
Birch and Marlin (1982) Two-year-olds given new cheeses or fruits repeatedly More exposure, more preference Practical value for reducing neophobia
Birch (1980) Preschool children eating with peers Children shifted vegetable choices towards peers’ Supports social learning; short-term lab-style setting
Brown and Ogden (2004) Parents and children’s eating Snack intake, motives and body dissatisfaction correlated Correlation; shared genes not ruled out
Anand and Brobeck (1951) LH lesions in rats Rats stopped eating Lesions also hit passing nerve fibres
Hetherington and Ranson (1940) VMH lesions in rats Overeating and obesity Animal brains differ from human
Cummings et al. (2001) Ghrelin before and after meals Rises before meals, falls after Suggests a role in starting meals
Wren et al. (2001) Ghrelin given to people Food intake increased Experimental, so suggests cause
Montague et al. (1997) Two related children with congenital leptin deficiency Severe obesity Rare cases; most people with obesity have high leptin
Holland et al. (1988) Twins with AN Higher concordance in MZ than DZ MZ concordance well below 100%
Watson et al. (2019) Genome-wide study of AN Several gene locations; psychiatric and metabolic links Each gene adds small risk
Kaye et al. (2009) Review of brain systems in AN Serotonin and dopamine differences, even after recovery Starvation may cause changes
Minuchin et al. (1978) Clinical work with families Enmeshment, over-protection, conflict avoidance Observational; may blame parents
Bruch (1978) Clinical account of AN Lack of autonomy; food restriction as control Based on case material
Becker et al. (2002) Fijian girls soon after TV arrived and three years later Share with high-risk eating-attitude scores rose from about 13% to about 29% Measured attitudes, not diagnosis
Garner and Bemis (1982) Cognitive account of AN Irrational beliefs and reasoning errors Distortions may be effects of AN
Stunkard et al. (1986) Adopted adults Weight linked to biological, not adoptive, parents Separates genes and upbringing
Frayling et al. (2007) FTO gene variant Two copies: about 3 kg heavier on average Small effect; polygenic
Wang et al. (2001) Brain scans and obesity Lower dopamine D2 receptor availability Correlational; direction unclear
Herman and Mack (1975) Milkshake preload, then ice cream Restrained eaters ate more after preload Lab task; low ecological validity
Wardle and Beales (1988) Women with obesity: diet, exercise, none Diet group ate more in tests Supports restraint theory
Herman and Polivy (1984) Boundary model Dieters have wider zone and a diet boundary Hard to measure boundaries
Stunkard and Messick (1985) Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire Measures restraint, disinhibition, hunger Self-report

Must-know distinctions

  • Ghrelin vs leptin. Ghrelin: stomach, “go”, rises when empty. Leptin: fat tissue, “stop”, reflects energy stores.
  • LH vs VMH. LH damage: stops eating. VMH damage: overeating.
  • Neophobia vs taste aversion. Neophobia is avoidance of the new. Taste aversion is avoidance learned after illness.
  • Innate vs learned. Evolution explains starting preferences; learning explains how they change.
  • Restraint vs disinhibition. Restraint is the attempt; disinhibition is the collapse of the attempt.
  • Genetic vs neural. Genetic: inherited risk (twins, adoption, genes). Neural: brain structures and chemicals (hypothalamus, serotonin, dopamine).
  • Explanations of AN vs explanations of obesity. Learn them separately; AN is a diagnosed eating disorder, while obesity is a body weight category.

Mini essay plan: “Discuss psychological explanations for obesity.” [16]

  1. AO1 (6 marks). Restraint theory: limiting intake can backfire (Herman and Mack, 1975). Disinhibition: stress, alcohol or a broken rule ends restraint. Boundary model: hunger and satiety boundaries; dieters’ diet boundary; once crossed, eating continues to satiety.
  2. AO3 point 1. Wardle and Beales (1988) support restraint theory with random allocation, which allows cause and effect.
  3. AO3 point 2. Some people restrain successfully, so the theory over-predicts failure.
  4. AO3 point 3. Lab taste tests may not reflect daily eating; low ecological validity.
  5. AO3 point 4. Psychological explanations ignore genes; an interactionist view combines restraint with genetic risk such as FTO.
  6. AO3 point 5. Practical value: helps explain why strict diets often fail.

Keep each AO3 point to: point, evidence, explanation, link back to the question.

Quick self-test

  1. What is neophobia?
  2. Why is taste aversion called “prepared” learning?
  3. Which hormone is released by an empty stomach?
  4. Where is leptin produced?
  5. What happened to rats with VMH damage?
  6. Name one genetic study of anorexia nervosa.
  7. Which three ideas does the specification list for family systems theory?
  8. What did Becker et al. (2002) measure?
  9. Give an example of an irrational belief linked to AN.
  10. What did Frayling et al. (2007) find?
  11. What is disinhibition?
  12. In the boundary model, what happens when a dieter crosses the diet boundary?

Answers

  1. A reluctance to eat unfamiliar foods.
  2. Animals are biologically ready to link taste with illness, often after one pairing and a delay.
  3. Ghrelin.
  4. Fat (adipose) tissue.
  5. They overate and became obese.
  6. Holland et al. (1988), a twin study; or Watson et al. (2019), a genome-wide study.
  7. Enmeshment, autonomy and control.
  8. Eating attitudes and behaviours in Fijian girls after TV arrived, not diagnosed AN.
  9. “If I gain any weight I am a failure”, or all-or-nothing thinking about food.
  10. Adults with two copies of a higher-risk FTO variant were about 3 kg heavier on average.
  11. The breakdown of restraint, so the person overeats.
  12. They keep eating until they reach the satiety boundary.

Where marks are usually lost

  • Swapping ghrelin and leptin, or saying both come from the stomach.
  • Writing “the hypothalamus controls hunger” without naming LH, VMH or the arcuate nucleus.
  • Describing a study without stating what it shows about the explanation.
  • Using Becker et al. (2002) as proof of AN cases rather than eating attitudes.
  • Listing family systems terms without explaining how enmeshment leads to a struggle for autonomy and control.
  • Ignoring the scenario on application questions; marks need its details.
  • Evaluating with generic points (“it is reductionist”) without explaining why it matters for this explanation.
  • Writing about dieting advice instead of theory, or using stigmatising language.

Next steps

Revisit the Approaches in Psychology study guide for the biological, social learning and cognitive approaches behind these explanations, then try the Eating behaviour practice questions. For reductionism, determinism and gender bias as evaluation points, see the Issues and debates study guide.

Official syllabus

These notes follow section 4.3.6 Eating behaviour and the Paper 3 structure of the AQA AS and A-level Psychology (7181, 7182) specification, Version 1.4 (1 September 2025), for teaching from September 2025.

Get free revision emails (optional)

Occasional emails with practice questions, worked explanations and links to free resources for the qualification and subjects you choose. No spam, and you can unsubscribe from any email. The free tools on this site never need an email.

Subjects (optional, up to 6)

Choose a qualification to see its subjects.

Related resources

Related articles

Studying this with a teacher

Working through Psychology A LEVELS?

This page is free and stays free. Marlbridge is not offering Psychology classes at the moment, so there is no tuition to book for it. The free study resources stay open to everyone.