Revision Notes
AQA A-level Psychology (7182): Paper 3 — Eating behaviour — Revision Notes
Condensed AQA 7182 eating behaviour notes: key terms, studies at a glance, anorexia and obesity explanations, an essay plan and a quick self-test.
- Subject
- Psychology
- Level
- A LEVELS
- Topic
- Paper 3 — Eating behaviour
- Author
- Marlbridge Academic Team
- Updated
- Checked by
- Marlbridge Academic Team, against the official specification, (what this means)
Aligned to AQA A Level Psychology (7182), Version 1.4 (1 September 2025), for teaching from September 2025. Official specification .
Syllabus page (what it covers and how it is assessed): AQA A Level Psychology.
Syllabus points this page covers
7182
- 3 Issues and options in Psychology (whole topic)
- 3.3.6 Eating behaviour
For full explanations and worked paragraphs, use the Eating behaviour study guide first.
These notes cover section 4.3.6 Eating behaviour of the AQA AS and A-level Psychology (7181, 7182) specification, Version 1.4 (1 September 2025), for teaching from September 2025. Eating behaviour sits in Option 2 with Schizophrenia and Stress. It is assessed in Section C of Paper 3: Issues and Options in Psychology (2 hours, 96 marks, 33.3% of the A-level), where you answer on one topic from Option 2 for 24 marks.
Find every unit on the AQA A-level Psychology hub, track progress with the 7182 checklist, and practise with the Eating behaviour practice questions.
Paper 3 rules in one box
- Section A: Issues and debates in Psychology, compulsory, 24 marks.
- Section B: one topic from Option 1 (Relationships, Gender, Cognition and development), 24 marks.
- Section C: one topic from Option 2 (Schizophrenia, Eating behaviour, Stress), 24 marks.
- Section D: one topic from Option 3 (Aggression, Forensic Psychology, Addiction), 24 marks.
- Each section has multiple choice, short answer and extended writing questions.
- Research methods, practical skills and maths skills are also assessed in Paper 3.
Key terms
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Neophobia | Reluctance to eat unfamiliar foods; thought to protect young children from toxins |
| Taste aversion | Learned avoidance of a food after it has been followed by illness; can form after one pairing |
| Preparedness | Biological readiness to learn some links (taste and illness) more easily than others |
| Lateral hypothalamus (LH) | Area linked to starting eating in the dual-centre model |
| Ventromedial hypothalamus (VMH) | Area linked to stopping eating (satiety) in the dual-centre model |
| Arcuate nucleus | Part of the hypothalamus that receives hormone signals about hunger and energy stores |
| Ghrelin | Hormone released mainly by the stomach when empty; increases hunger |
| Leptin | Hormone released by fat tissue; signals satiety and reduces appetite |
| Leptin resistance | The brain responds weakly to leptin despite high levels |
| Concordance | The rate at which both members of a twin pair share a condition |
| Enmeshment | Family members over-involved with weak boundaries between them |
| Autonomy | Independence; the ability to make one’s own decisions |
| Modelling | Imitating the behaviour of a role model |
| Vicarious reinforcement | Learning from seeing another person rewarded |
| Cognitive distortion | Biased or inaccurate thinking, such as seeing one’s body as larger than it is |
| Irrational belief | An extreme, rigid belief, such as “any weight gain means failure” |
| Restraint | A deliberate attempt to limit food intake |
| Disinhibition | Breakdown of restraint, leading to overeating |
| Boundary model | Intake is set by a hunger boundary and a satiety boundary, with a self-set diet boundary for dieters |
Theories and studies at a glance
| Who | What | Finding | One evaluation point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steiner (1979) | Newborn facial reactions to tastes | Positive to sweet, rejection to bitter | Supports innate preferences, but adults learn to like bitter foods |
| Garcia and Koelling (1966) | Rats: taste or light/sound paired with illness | Taste-illness link learned easily; light/sound-illness not | Shows preparedness; animal study, so generalise with care |
| Bernstein (1978) | Children having chemotherapy given new ice cream | Those who had it before nausea-causing treatment later avoided it | Human evidence of taste aversion; real-world application |
| Birch and Marlin (1982) | Two-year-olds given new cheeses or fruits repeatedly | More exposure, more preference | Practical value for reducing neophobia |
| Birch (1980) | Preschool children eating with peers | Children shifted vegetable choices towards peers’ | Supports social learning; short-term lab-style setting |
| Brown and Ogden (2004) | Parents and children’s eating | Snack intake, motives and body dissatisfaction correlated | Correlation; shared genes not ruled out |
| Anand and Brobeck (1951) | LH lesions in rats | Rats stopped eating | Lesions also hit passing nerve fibres |
| Hetherington and Ranson (1940) | VMH lesions in rats | Overeating and obesity | Animal brains differ from human |
| Cummings et al. (2001) | Ghrelin before and after meals | Rises before meals, falls after | Suggests a role in starting meals |
| Wren et al. (2001) | Ghrelin given to people | Food intake increased | Experimental, so suggests cause |
| Montague et al. (1997) | Two related children with congenital leptin deficiency | Severe obesity | Rare cases; most people with obesity have high leptin |
| Holland et al. (1988) | Twins with AN | Higher concordance in MZ than DZ | MZ concordance well below 100% |
| Watson et al. (2019) | Genome-wide study of AN | Several gene locations; psychiatric and metabolic links | Each gene adds small risk |
| Kaye et al. (2009) | Review of brain systems in AN | Serotonin and dopamine differences, even after recovery | Starvation may cause changes |
| Minuchin et al. (1978) | Clinical work with families | Enmeshment, over-protection, conflict avoidance | Observational; may blame parents |
| Bruch (1978) | Clinical account of AN | Lack of autonomy; food restriction as control | Based on case material |
| Becker et al. (2002) | Fijian girls soon after TV arrived and three years later | Share with high-risk eating-attitude scores rose from about 13% to about 29% | Measured attitudes, not diagnosis |
| Garner and Bemis (1982) | Cognitive account of AN | Irrational beliefs and reasoning errors | Distortions may be effects of AN |
| Stunkard et al. (1986) | Adopted adults | Weight linked to biological, not adoptive, parents | Separates genes and upbringing |
| Frayling et al. (2007) | FTO gene variant | Two copies: about 3 kg heavier on average | Small effect; polygenic |
| Wang et al. (2001) | Brain scans and obesity | Lower dopamine D2 receptor availability | Correlational; direction unclear |
| Herman and Mack (1975) | Milkshake preload, then ice cream | Restrained eaters ate more after preload | Lab task; low ecological validity |
| Wardle and Beales (1988) | Women with obesity: diet, exercise, none | Diet group ate more in tests | Supports restraint theory |
| Herman and Polivy (1984) | Boundary model | Dieters have wider zone and a diet boundary | Hard to measure boundaries |
| Stunkard and Messick (1985) | Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire | Measures restraint, disinhibition, hunger | Self-report |
Must-know distinctions
- Ghrelin vs leptin. Ghrelin: stomach, “go”, rises when empty. Leptin: fat tissue, “stop”, reflects energy stores.
- LH vs VMH. LH damage: stops eating. VMH damage: overeating.
- Neophobia vs taste aversion. Neophobia is avoidance of the new. Taste aversion is avoidance learned after illness.
- Innate vs learned. Evolution explains starting preferences; learning explains how they change.
- Restraint vs disinhibition. Restraint is the attempt; disinhibition is the collapse of the attempt.
- Genetic vs neural. Genetic: inherited risk (twins, adoption, genes). Neural: brain structures and chemicals (hypothalamus, serotonin, dopamine).
- Explanations of AN vs explanations of obesity. Learn them separately; AN is a diagnosed eating disorder, while obesity is a body weight category.
Mini essay plan: “Discuss psychological explanations for obesity.” [16]
- AO1 (6 marks). Restraint theory: limiting intake can backfire (Herman and Mack, 1975). Disinhibition: stress, alcohol or a broken rule ends restraint. Boundary model: hunger and satiety boundaries; dieters’ diet boundary; once crossed, eating continues to satiety.
- AO3 point 1. Wardle and Beales (1988) support restraint theory with random allocation, which allows cause and effect.
- AO3 point 2. Some people restrain successfully, so the theory over-predicts failure.
- AO3 point 3. Lab taste tests may not reflect daily eating; low ecological validity.
- AO3 point 4. Psychological explanations ignore genes; an interactionist view combines restraint with genetic risk such as FTO.
- AO3 point 5. Practical value: helps explain why strict diets often fail.
Keep each AO3 point to: point, evidence, explanation, link back to the question.
Quick self-test
- What is neophobia?
- Why is taste aversion called “prepared” learning?
- Which hormone is released by an empty stomach?
- Where is leptin produced?
- What happened to rats with VMH damage?
- Name one genetic study of anorexia nervosa.
- Which three ideas does the specification list for family systems theory?
- What did Becker et al. (2002) measure?
- Give an example of an irrational belief linked to AN.
- What did Frayling et al. (2007) find?
- What is disinhibition?
- In the boundary model, what happens when a dieter crosses the diet boundary?
Answers
- A reluctance to eat unfamiliar foods.
- Animals are biologically ready to link taste with illness, often after one pairing and a delay.
- Ghrelin.
- Fat (adipose) tissue.
- They overate and became obese.
- Holland et al. (1988), a twin study; or Watson et al. (2019), a genome-wide study.
- Enmeshment, autonomy and control.
- Eating attitudes and behaviours in Fijian girls after TV arrived, not diagnosed AN.
- “If I gain any weight I am a failure”, or all-or-nothing thinking about food.
- Adults with two copies of a higher-risk FTO variant were about 3 kg heavier on average.
- The breakdown of restraint, so the person overeats.
- They keep eating until they reach the satiety boundary.
Where marks are usually lost
- Swapping ghrelin and leptin, or saying both come from the stomach.
- Writing “the hypothalamus controls hunger” without naming LH, VMH or the arcuate nucleus.
- Describing a study without stating what it shows about the explanation.
- Using Becker et al. (2002) as proof of AN cases rather than eating attitudes.
- Listing family systems terms without explaining how enmeshment leads to a struggle for autonomy and control.
- Ignoring the scenario on application questions; marks need its details.
- Evaluating with generic points (“it is reductionist”) without explaining why it matters for this explanation.
- Writing about dieting advice instead of theory, or using stigmatising language.
Next steps
Revisit the Approaches in Psychology study guide for the biological, social learning and cognitive approaches behind these explanations, then try the Eating behaviour practice questions. For reductionism, determinism and gender bias as evaluation points, see the Issues and debates study guide.
Official syllabus
These notes follow section 4.3.6 Eating behaviour and the Paper 3 structure of the AQA AS and A-level Psychology (7181, 7182) specification, Version 1.4 (1 September 2025), for teaching from September 2025.
Get free revision emails (optional)
Occasional emails with practice questions, worked explanations and links to free resources for the qualification and subjects you choose. No spam, and you can unsubscribe from any email. The free tools on this site never need an email.
Related resources
-
Study guides
AQA A-level Psychology (7182): Paper 3 — Eating behaviour — Study Guide
AQA A-level Psychology 7182 eating behaviour explained: food preferences, hypothalamus, ghrelin and leptin, anorexia and obesity, with evaluation.
Psychology · AQA · A Level
Read guide -
Practice questions
AQA A-level Psychology (7182): Paper 3 — Eating behaviour — Practice Questions
Original AQA 7182 eating behaviour questions on food preferences, ghrelin, anorexia and obesity, with mark-by-mark answers and examiner insights.
Psychology · AQA · A Level
Try questions -
Study guides
AQA A-level Psychology (7182): Paper 3 – Forensic Psychology – Study Guide
AQA A-level Psychology 7182 Forensic Psychology guide: offender profiling, biological and psychological explanations, and dealing with offending.
Psychology · AQA · A Level
Read guide
Related articles
-
teaching
A Level tuition in Dubai: Cambridge or Pearson Edexcel International A Level?
Schools in Dubai and Abu Dhabi teach either Cambridge International AS & A Level or Pearson Edexcel International A Level. How the two are structured, why it matters for tuition, and how online classes from Lahore work.
9 October 2026
-
curriculum guides
Choosing subjects at IGCSE and A Level
How subject choices at 14 and 16 affect university options later, and how to keep pathways open without overloading a timetable.
28 July 2026
Studying this with a teacher
Working through Psychology A LEVELS?
This page is free and stays free. Marlbridge is not offering Psychology classes at the moment, so there is no tuition to book for it. The free study resources stay open to everyone.