Skip to content
Marlbridge

Practice Questions

Index Numbers: O Level Statistics 4040 and IGCSE 0479 Practice Questions

Original practice questions with full worked answers on price relatives, weighted aggregate index numbers (given and calculated weights), interpretation and limitations — O Level Statistics 4040 Topic 8 and IGCSE Statistics 0479 Topic 10.

Subject
Statistics
Level
O LEVELS, IGCSE
Topic
Topic 8 – Index Numbers
Updated

Aligned to Cambridge O Level IGCSE Statistics (4040, 0479), 2025-2027. Official specification (O Level) ; Official specification (IGCSE) .

Syllabus page (what it covers and how it is assessed): Cambridge O Level Statistics; Cambridge IGCSE Statistics.

Syllabus points this page covers

4040

  • 8 Index numbers (whole topic)

0479

  • 10 Index numbers (whole topic)

Found an error? Report a correction.

Want a teacher for this? Marlbridge teaches Statistics online. Request a free trial class.

These are original questions written for Marlbridge, for revision and practice on this content. They are not reproduced past-paper questions, and they do not replicate the exam’s exact structure, question count or mark tariffs. Use them alongside the official past papers from Cambridge.

Study the method first: index numbers study guide.


Questions

1. The price of a bus ticket rose from Rs 80 in 2023 to Rs 92 in 2025. Using 2023 as the base year, calculate the price relative for 2025. [1]

2. The price relative of a textbook in 2025, with 2022 as the base year, is 135. The textbook costs Rs 270 in 2025. Find its price in 2022. [2]

3. A cost-of-living index for a city uses four groups of spending. The weights and the 2025 price relatives (2020 = 100) are:

Group Weight Price relative
Food 45 118
Housing 30 106
Transport 15 124
Other 10 110

(a) Calculate the weighted aggregate index for 2025. [3]

(b) Interpret your answer. [1]

(c) Transport has the highest price relative, but changes to it affect the index less than changes to food. Explain why. [1]

4. A bakery buys three ingredients. Its prices (Rs per kg) and the quantities it used in the base year, 2024, are:

Ingredient Price 2024 Price 2025 Quantity used in 2024 (kg)
Flour 60 75 40
Butter 250 270 8
Sugar 30 36 50

(a) Calculate the price relative for each ingredient, using 2024 as the base year. [2]

(b) Calculate a weight for each ingredient from base-year expenditure. [2]

(c) Calculate the weighted aggregate index for 2025. [3]

5. By 2025 the bakery in Question 4 uses much less butter and more margarine, which is not in the index. Give two reasons why the index in 4(c) may no longer measure the change in the bakery’s costs accurately. [2]


Answers

1. 92 ÷ 80 × 100 = 115 [1].

2. Price in 2022 = 270 ÷ 135 × 100 [1] = Rs 200 [1].

3. (a) 45 × 118 + 30 × 106 + 15 × 124 + 10 × 110 = 5 310 + 3 180 + 1 860 + 1 100 = 11 450 [1]; sum of weights = 100 [1]; index = 11 450 ÷ 100 = 114.5 [1].

(b) On average, weighted by spending, prices in the city rose by 14.5% between 2020 and 2025 [1].

(c) Food has a weight of 45 against 15 for transport, so a one-point change in the food price relative moves the index three times as much [1].

4. (a) Flour 75 ÷ 60 × 100 = 125; butter 270 ÷ 250 × 100 = 108; sugar 36 ÷ 30 × 100 = 120 [2] (1 mark for two correct).

(b) Flour 60 × 40 = 2 400; butter 250 × 8 = 2 000; sugar 30 × 50 = 1 500 [2] (1 mark for two correct). Total 5 900.

(c) (2 400 × 125 + 2 000 × 108 + 1 500 × 120) ÷ 5 900 [1] = (300 000 + 216 000 + 180 000) ÷ 5 900 = 696 000 ÷ 5 900 [1] = 118.0 (to 1 decimal place) [1].

5. Any two, linked to the bakery:

  • The weights are based on 2024 spending; the bakery now buys less butter, so butter’s weight is too large [1].
  • Margarine is now part of the bakery’s costs but is not in the index at all [1].
  • The index assumes the same quantities are bought each year, so it does not reflect the bakery switching to a cheaper ingredient [1].

Where marks are usually lost

  • Averaging price relatives without weights: in 4(c) that gives (125 + 108 + 120) ÷ 3 = 117.7, not 118.0.
  • Using the quantities (40, 8, 50) as the weights instead of base-year expenditure (price × quantity).
  • Dividing by the number of items instead of by the sum of the weights.
  • In 3(b), saying prices rose by 114.5%.
  • In Question 5, writing general limitations (“weights change”) without saying which weight and why.

Next steps

Get free revision emails (optional)

Occasional emails with practice questions, worked explanations and links to free resources for the qualification and subjects you choose. No spam, and you can unsubscribe from any email. The free tools on this site never need an email.

Subjects (optional, up to 6)

Choose a qualification to see its subjects.

Related resources

Related articles

Studying this with a teacher

Working through Statistics O LEVELS, IGCSE?

This page is free and stays free. If you would rather be taught it, Marlbridge runs Statistics classes one-to-one and in small groups of up to 15, online in your own time zone. The first trial class is free. WhatsApp replies within an hour (8am–11pm Pakistan time, every day); email the same day.