Revision Notes
Cambridge International AS & A Level Geography (9696): Topic 12 – Environmental management – Revision Notes
Condensed revision notes for Cambridge 9696 Geography topic 12, Environmental management: key terms, case studies, an essay plan and a self-test.
- Subject
- Geography
- Level
- A LEVEL
- Topic
- Topic 12 – Environmental management
- Author
- Marlbridge Academic Team
- Updated
- Reviewed by
- Azam Siddique (what this means)
Aligned to Cambridge A Level Geography (9696), 2025-2026. Official specification .
Syllabus page (what it covers and how it is assessed): Cambridge A Level Geography.
Syllabus points this page covers
9696 (A Level)
- 12 Environmental management (whole topic)
- 12.1 Sustainable energy supplies
- 12.2 The management of energy supply
- 12.3 Environmental degradation
- 12.4 The management of a degraded environment
For full explanations, read the Environmental management study guide first.
These notes cover topic 12, Environmental management (sections 12.1 to 12.4), of the Cambridge International AS & A Level Geography (9696) syllabus for examination in 2025 and 2026. It is an Advanced Human Geography Option assessed in Paper 4 (1 hour 30 minutes, 60 marks, 25% of the A Level). On each of your two chosen options you answer one structured question (10 marks) and one essay from a choice of two (20 marks).
Track your progress on the Cambridge A Level Geography hub and checklist. Then try the practice questions.
What the syllabus lists
- 12.1 Sustainable energy supplies: renewable and non-renewable resources; national-scale factors in energy demand, supply and mix (sustainability, levels of development, resource endowment, climate, income, technology, pollution, energy policy, energy security); trends in fossil fuels, nuclear, HEP, wind and biofuels in LICs, MICs and HICs; environmental impacts of production, transport and usage at local and global scales.
- 12.2 The management of energy supply: two case studies – one country’s overall electrical energy strategy, and one named located scheme to produce electricity. Both must show changes in demand and supply, power production and its location, and be evaluated.
- 12.3 Environmental degradation: land, air and water pollution (nature, causes, solutions); water demand, supply and quality; factors in rural and urban degradation; constraints on improvement; protection of environments at risk at the local or regional scale (needs, measures, outcomes).
- 12.4 The management of a degraded environment: one case study – causes, problems, issues in improving it, evaluation of the attempted solutions.
Key terms
| Term | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Non-renewable (stock) resource | Formed over geological time and finite: coal, oil, gas, uranium |
| Renewable (flow) resource | Naturally replenished on a human time scale: HEP, wind, solar, biofuels |
| Energy mix | The balance of sources a country uses |
| Energy security | Reliable access to enough affordable energy |
| Resource endowment | The natural resources a country has within its territory |
| Sustainability | Meeting present needs without harming the ability of future generations to meet theirs |
| Point-source pollution | Pollution from one identifiable outlet, such as a factory pipe |
| Diffuse pollution | Pollution from many scattered sources, such as farm runoff |
| Eutrophication | Nutrient enrichment of water causing algal growth and oxygen loss |
| Physical water scarcity | Not enough water exists to meet demand |
| Economic water scarcity | Water exists but people cannot afford to access it |
| Salinisation | Build-up of salt in soils, often from irrigation without drainage |
| Environmental degradation | Decline in the quality of land, air, water or ecosystems |
Energy trends by development level (12.1)
| Source | LICs | MICs | HICs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fossil fuels | Low use per person; oil for transport | Rising with industrialisation; coal large in China | Coal falling (UK’s last coal plant closed 30 September 2024) |
| Nuclear | Little or none | Growing in some, such as China | Mixed: France relies on it; Germany has left it |
| HEP | Much potential untapped because of cost | Large schemes: Three Gorges, Itaipu | Many of the best sites already used; Norway relies on HEP |
| Wind | Small but growing | Rapid growth in China | Rapid growth, helped by falling costs |
| Biofuels | Traditional biomass (fuelwood, charcoal) a main household fuel | Brazil’s sugar-cane ethanol | Used as a blend in vehicle fuel |
Pollution summary (12.3)
| Type | Main causes | Example solutions |
|---|---|---|
| Air | Vehicles, power stations, industry, burning waste | Emission standards, scrubbers, low-emission zones |
| Water | Sewage, industrial effluent, farm nitrates, thermal discharge | Wastewater treatment, buffer strips, discharge permits |
| Land | Solid waste, mining spoil, heavy metals, pesticides | Sanitary landfill, recycling, clean-up of contaminated land |
Case studies and examples at a glance
| Example | Syllabus point | What happened | Key fact | One evaluation point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Germany, Energiewende | 12.2 country strategy | Feed-in payments from the EEG (2000); nuclear exit; coal to end by 2038 at the latest | Last reactors closed 15 April 2023; renewables 54% of demand in 2024 | Large change in the mix, but north-south grid lag (SuedLink now due 2028) and high prices |
| Three Gorges Dam, Hubei, China | 12.2 named scheme | 22,500 MW HEP plant on the Yangtze, fully running 2012 | Nearly 112 TWh in 2020; 1.13-1.4 million displaced | National success on output; local people and the river ecosystem bear the costs |
| London ULEZ | 12.3 air pollution | Charge on older vehicles from April 2019, London-wide from August 2023 | TfL report: NO2 27% lower than without the zone | Health gains, but the cost falls hardest on lower-income drivers |
| Cape Town | 12.3 water supply and demand | Drought from 2015; “Day Zero” threatened | 50 litres per person per day from 1 February 2018 | Demand halved quickly, but winter rain also saved the city |
| Great Barrier Reef Marine Park | 12.3 protection at regional scale | Park created 1975; rezoned 2004 | No-take zones raised from 4.6% to 33.3% | Zoning handles local pressures, not global warming |
| Aral Sea | 12.4 degraded environment | Rivers diverted from the 1960s to irrigate cotton | Dike Kokaral (2005) raised the North Aral 12 m by 2008 | Partial success: the South Aral’s eastern basin dried out in 2014 |
Must-know distinctions
- Renewable vs sustainable. A renewable source can be used unsustainably – fuelwood cut faster than it regrows.
- Strategy vs scheme. 12.2 needs both: a national strategy (many sources and policies) and one located scheme (one plant).
- Demand vs supply factors. Income and climate mainly drive demand; resource endowment and technology mainly shape supply. Policy and security affect both.
- Local vs global impacts. A coal power station causes local air pollution and global CO2 emissions; say which scale you mean.
- Point-source vs diffuse. Point sources are easier to regulate because the polluter is known.
- Rural vs urban degradation. Rural: overpopulation, poor farming practices, deforestation. Urban: urbanisation, industry, waste.
- Needs, measures, outcomes. For protection questions, these are three separate parts; outcomes need evidence of change.
Mini essay plan
Question type: “With reference to one degraded environment you have studied, evaluate the success of attempts to improve it.” (20-mark essay style)
- Introduction: define degradation; name the Aral Sea and its location; state your line – partial success.
- Causes and problems (brief): diversion of the Amu Darya and Syr Darya for cotton from the 1960s; area down 60% and volume 80% between 1960 and 1998; salinity rise; fishing collapse at Muynak.
- Success in the north: Dike Kokaral (2005, World Bank loans); level up 12 m to 42 m by 2008; freshwater species and fishing returned.
- Failure in the south: Amu Darya still used for irrigation; eastern basin dry in 2014; dust and health problems continue.
- Why the difference: scale (transboundary river), economics (cotton income), cost, conflicting interests between farmers and fishing communities.
- Conclusion: judge success by area and by group. Success where the fix was local and affordable; failure where it needed many countries to change how they use water.
Spend most of your words on paragraphs 3-5. That is where AO4 evaluation marks sit.
Quick self-test
- Give two examples of non-renewable energy resources.
- Define energy security.
- Name three of the national-scale factors the syllabus lists for energy demand and supply.
- When did Germany’s last nuclear reactors close?
- What is the installed capacity of the Three Gorges Dam?
- Give one local and one global environmental impact of burning coal for electricity.
- What is the difference between point-source and diffuse pollution?
- What daily water limit did Cape Town introduce in February 2018?
- Name two factors in the degradation of urban environments listed in the syllabus.
- By how much did the 2004 rezoning raise no-take zones in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park?
- Which river was diverted to irrigate cotton and still starves the South Aral Sea?
- Give two constraints on improving a degraded environment.
Answers
- Any two: coal, oil, natural gas, uranium.
- Reliable access to enough affordable energy.
- Any three: sustainability, levels of development, resource endowment, climate, income, technology, pollution, energy policy, energy security.
- 15 April 2023.
- 22,500 MW.
- Local: air pollution such as particulates or acid rain. Global: CO2 emissions adding to the enhanced greenhouse effect.
- Point-source comes from one identifiable outlet; diffuse comes from many scattered sources.
- 50 litres per person per day.
- Any two: urbanisation, industrial development, inadequate waste management.
- From 4.6% to 33.3% of the park.
- The Amu Darya.
- Any two: cost, weak governance or enforcement, conflicting interests, transboundary scale, poverty, long recovery times.
Where marks are usually lost
- Giving a case study without the syllabus’s required parts. The 12.2 studies must cover demand, supply, production and location, plus an evaluation.
- Mixing up the two 12.2 case studies. A question on a “named located scheme” wants one plant, not a whole country.
- Listing energy trends without separating LICs, MICs and HICs, or without naming a source (HEP, wind, biofuels, nuclear).
- Stating impacts without a scale when the question asks for “local and global”.
- Describing pollution without its solutions, or solutions without saying how well they work.
- Treating “protection” answers as only measures. Needs and outcomes earn marks too.
- Ending an essay with a summary instead of a judgement. Paper 4 weights AO4 Evaluation at about 40%.
- Using numbers you are unsure of. A wrong statistic weakens an answer more than a well-explained general point.
The other Advanced Human Geography Options are Production, location and change, Global interdependence and Economic transition.
Official syllabus
These notes follow the Cambridge International AS & A Level Geography (9696) syllabus for examination in 2025 and 2026, topic 12, Environmental management (12.1-12.4). See also the exam preparation guide.
Get free revision emails (optional)
Occasional emails with practice questions, worked explanations and links to free resources for the qualification and subjects you choose. No spam, and you can unsubscribe from any email. The free tools on this site never need an email.
Related resources
-
Study guides
Cambridge International AS & A Level Geography (9696): Topic 12 – Environmental management – Study Guide
Study guide to Cambridge 9696 Geography topic 12: energy resources, Germany and Three Gorges case studies, pollution, degradation and the Aral Sea.
Geography · Cambridge · A Level
Read guide -
Practice questions
Cambridge International AS & A Level Geography (9696): Topic 12 – Environmental management – Practice Questions
Original practice questions with marked answers for Cambridge 9696 Geography topic 12: energy data, water pollution, degradation and case-study essays.
Geography · Cambridge · A Level
Try questions -
Study guides
Cambridge International A Level Geography (9696): Topic 13 – Global interdependence – Study Guide
Study guide to 9696 Global interdependence: trade, the WTO, Fairtrade, debt and aid, tourism growth and impacts, Butler's model and a Venice case study.
Geography · Cambridge · A Level
Read guide
Related articles
-
teaching
A Level tuition in Dubai: Cambridge or Pearson Edexcel International A Level?
Schools in Dubai and Abu Dhabi teach either Cambridge International AS & A Level or Pearson Edexcel International A Level. How the two are structured, why it matters for tuition, and how online classes from Lahore work.
9 October 2026
-
curriculum guides
Choosing subjects at IGCSE and A Level
How subject choices at 14 and 16 affect university options later, and how to keep pathways open without overloading a timetable.
28 July 2026
Studying this with a teacher
Working through Geography A LEVEL?
This page is free and stays free. Marlbridge is not offering Geography classes at the moment, so there is no tuition to book for it. The free study resources stay open to everyone.