Paper 2 Writers' Viewpoints and Perspectives: Practice Questions

These are original questions written for Marlbridge, in the style and at the standard of the examination. They are not reproduced past-paper questions — examination boards hold copyright in their own papers and their unseen extracts. Use these alongside the official past papers available free from your board.

Related: Paper 2 study guide

Section A — Reading (practise on two thematically linked, unseen non-fiction extracts of your choice — ideally one from the 19th century and one from the 20th or 21st)

1. Read Source A only (your 19th-century extract). List four things the text states explicitly about the writer’s situation, the place described, or the people involved. [4]

2. From Source A, select one short phrase you find effective and explain the writer’s use of language, including the effect created. [8]

3. Using both sources, compare how each writer conveys their attitude or feelings toward the subject they are writing about. Refer to specific methods each writer uses. [12]

4. Compare how the two writers present their different perspectives on [the shared theme of your chosen extracts], referring to specific methods each writer uses to convey their viewpoint. [16]

Section B — Writing

5. “Growing up in a small town limits young people’s opportunities rather than protecting them.” Write a letter to a local newspaper giving your own point of view on this statement. [40]

---

Answers (worked approach, since Section A depends on your chosen extracts)

1. As with Paper 1’s Question 1, look strictly for information the text states directly, not what you infer — four separate, clearly stated details from Source A alone score full marks. Do not use Source B here; Question 1 tests careful reading of a single text.

2. Follow the same three-step method as any language-analysis question: quote a short, precise phrase; name the technique (word class, imagery, connotation); explain the specific effect created, tied to the writer’s evident attitude in this extract specifically — not a generic comment that could apply to any text.

3. A strong answer identifies at least two or three genuinely comparable points — not simply “Writer A feels X, Writer B feels Y” — and explains how each writer’s specific choices (word choice, imagery, structural emphasis) build that attitude. Cross-reference between the two texts throughout the answer, rather than discussing each source in a separate, self-contained paragraph.

4. The highest-value skill this question rewards is genuine, sustained comparison of method, not just content: for each point, state what each writer does, quote briefly from each, and explain how their choices differ in achieving a broadly similar (or contrasting) purpose. Structuring the answer point-by-point across both texts (“both writers open with…, but where Writer A uses…, Writer B instead uses…”) consistently outperforms a two-halves structure that discusses Source A fully, then Source B fully, with comparison only added at the very end.

5. Mark against content and organisation (a clear, sustained viewpoint; a structure suited to a letter — opening address, developed argument, closing call to action; register appropriate to a newspaper readership) and technical accuracy (accurate spelling, punctuation and a range of sentence structures). A strong response commits to a single position early, rather than hedging between both sides, since Section B rewards a clear, persuasively sustained viewpoint over balanced even-handedness.

Building comparison points quickly

The comparison questions (3 and 4) are where most of Paper 2’s marks sit, so it is worth practising a fast method for generating comparison points before writing a full answer. A reliable approach: read both sources once each for overall sense, then draw a simple two-column table headed with each source’s title, and fill in short notes under shared prompts — attitude to the topic, choice of tone (serious, ironic, urgent, nostalgic), one striking method each writer uses, and who each writer seems to be addressing. Five minutes spent building this table before writing consistently produces a more genuinely comparative answer than starting to write immediately and hoping connections emerge along the way.

Timing across the whole paper

Paper 2 lasts 1 hour 45 minutes for 80 marks split evenly between Section A and Section B — a rough guide is just over a minute per mark, so roughly 50 minutes on Section A (allowing extra time for planning Question 4’s comparison) and 50 minutes on Section B, with 5 minutes spared at the start for reading both sources carefully before answering anything. Because Question 4 is worth four times as much as Question 1, time should scale with marks: spending equal time on all four reading questions is a common, costly mistake, since a beautifully thorough Question 1 answer cannot earn more than 4 marks no matter how much time is spent on it.

A second Section B brief, for extra practice

Try planning (without necessarily writing in full) a second viewpoint task: your local council is proposing to close the town’s only youth centre to save money. Write a speech for your school assembly giving your point of view. Before drafting, decide: what tone suits a spoken address to peers (direct, energetic, rhetorical questions) as opposed to a written letter to adults? What is the single strongest point to open with, given a speech’s opening moments matter more than a letter’s? Practising this planning step across different specified forms (letter, speech, article, review) — not just the one used in Question 5 above — builds genuine flexibility for whichever form actually appears in the exam.

Where marks are usually lost

• Answering Question 1 using both sources instead of Source A alone.
• Summarising each source’s content separately in the comparison questions instead of comparing specific writing methods directly.
• Ignoring the historical gap between a 19th-century source and a modern one, reading period-appropriate vocabulary or sentence structure as simply “old fashioned” rather than a deliberate, analysable feature.
• Writing a narrative or descriptive piece in Section B when the task calls for a clear, sustained viewpoint in a specified form.
• Hedging between both sides of an issue in Section B instead of committing to and developing a single, persuasive position.

Official syllabus

AQA, GCSE English Language (8700) Specification, Section 4, Scheme of Assessment, and specification-at-a-glance, https://www.aqa.org.uk/subjects/english/gcse/english-8700/specification/scheme-of-assessment and https://www.aqa.org.uk/subjects/english/gcse/english-8700/specification/specification-at-a-glance, fetched and verified in full 2026-09-03.