Revision Notes
Cambridge A-Level Sociology: Religion, Social Order and Social Change — Revision Notes (9699)
Condensed Cambridge 9699 notes on 11.1-11.3: definitions, measurement, religiosity by group, Durkheim and Marx, Weber, liberation theology and Iran 1979.
- Subject
- Sociology
- Level
- A LEVEL
- Topic
- Paper 4 – Globalisation, Media and Religion
- Author
- Marlbridge Academic Team
- Updated
- Reviewed by
- Naqiya Yousaf (what this means)
Aligned to Cambridge A Level Sociology (9699), 2024-2026. Official specification .
Syllabus page (what it covers and how it is assessed): Cambridge A Level Sociology.
Syllabus points this page covers
9699 (A Level)
- 11.1 Religion and society
- 11.2 Religion and social order
- 11.3 Religion as a source of social change
Found an error? Report a correction.
Need help with this topic? Request a free trial class for A Level Sociology (9699).
These notes condense heading 11 Religion and social order from Cambridge International A Level Sociology (9699) Paper 4. The debate in one line: religion either integrates society (functionalism), supports the powerful (Marxism) or can transform society (Weber, liberation theology, religious political movements). Defining and measuring religion shapes every answer, so start there.
Full explanations: religion and social order study guide.
Syllabus coverage
9699 (2024–2026) Paper 4 Section C, heading 11: 11.1 Religion and society; 11.2 Religion and social order; 11.3 Religion as a source of social change.
Key terms
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Substantive definition | Defines religion by its content, e.g. belief in the supernatural (Weber) |
| Functional definition | Defines religion by what it does for society or individuals (Durkheim) |
| Religiosity | Degree of religious belief, belonging and practice |
| Sacred / profane | Set apart and special / ordinary (Durkheim) |
| Collective conscience | Shared norms and values binding society |
| Civil religion | Sacred reverence for the nation (Bellah, 1967) |
| Ideology | Ideas that legitimate the interests of the powerful |
| Theodicy of disprivilege | Religious explanation of suffering that appeals to the poor (Weber) |
| Asceticism | Self-discipline and denial of pleasure |
| Calling | Duty to serve God through one’s worldly work |
| Liberation theology | Catholic movement committed to the poor and social justice |
| Relative autonomy | Religion can act partly independently of the economy (Maduro, 1982) |
11.1 Defining, measuring and religiosity
- Definitions: substantive (Weber), functional (Durkheim), social constructionist (interactionist).
- Measurement problems: belief versus belonging versus practice; Glock and Stark’s dimensions (1968); question wording; social desirability; private belief unobservable.
- Religiosity by group:
- Gender — women often more religious; socialisation, caring roles, life course.
- Age — older people often more religious; ageing or generation effect.
- Ethnicity — high among many minorities; cultural defence and cultural transition (Bruce, 1996).
- Class — theodicy of disprivilege for the poor; world-affirming movements for the affluent.
- Other belief systems: science, political ideologies, humanism — rivals or functional equivalents?
11.2 Functionalism versus Marxism
| Functionalism | Marxism | |
|---|---|---|
| Key names | Durkheim (1912), Malinowski, Parsons, Bellah (1967) | Marx (1844), Maduro (1982) |
| Role of religion | Social solidarity, shared values, coping with crisis | Ideology, legitimation of inequality, compensation |
| View of society | Consensus | Class conflict |
| Strength | Explains ritual, national ceremony, crisis response | Explains links between religion and power |
| Limitation | Ignores conflict and diversity; small-scale evidence | Ignores religion as a source of change; assumes false consciousness |
11.3 Religion and social change
- Weber (1905): Calvinist predestination → anxiety → ascetic hard work and reinvestment → spirit of capitalism.
- Alternatives: Tawney (1926) — economic change came first; Marxist economic explanation; capitalism in non-Calvinist areas.
- Liberation theology: Gutiérrez (1971); Archbishop Romero assassinated (1980); religion against oppression.
- Evangelicals in US politics: Moral Majority (1979, Jerry Falwell); Bruce (2003) — limited policy success.
- Iranian revolution (1979): Ayatollah Khomeini; religion as revolutionary force.
Worked essay plan
Practice question: “Religion is a conservative force in society.” Evaluate this view. [35]
- Define “conservative” (preserving existing values and power) and define religion.
- Support: functionalism — social solidarity and shared values; Marxism — ideology and opium of the people.
- Challenge: Weber’s Protestant ethic; liberation theology; Iranian revolution.
- Nuance: Maduro’s relative autonomy; religion can be conservative in values but radical in action (e.g. a revolution establishing a traditional moral order).
- Judgement: religion’s effect depends on its relationship to power in a given society.
Model evaluation paragraph
On Durkheim’s functionalism: “Durkheim’s study of totemism shows how shared ritual can bind a small, homogeneous society together, and national ceremonies in modern states suggest religion-like rituals still create solidarity. However, his evidence came from secondary accounts of a small-scale society, and in large, religiously diverse societies religion often divides rather than unites, as sectarian conflicts show. Marxists would add that any ‘solidarity’ produced may simply mask class inequality. Durkheim’s theory is most convincing for societies with one dominant faith and least convincing where several religions compete.”
This shows the examiner methodological criticism, a competing theory and a conditional judgement.
Common mistakes and exam traps
- Using only Durkheim and Marx — 11.3 expects change arguments too.
- Treating “conservative” only as “right-wing”; sociologically it means resisting change.
- Describing Weber without the mechanism (predestination, anxiety, asceticism, reinvestment).
- Forgetting measurement difficulties and social groups in 11.1.
- Not using the syllabus’s named case studies (US Evangelicals, Iran).
Quick self-test
- Give one problem with functional definitions of religion.
- What did Malinowski observe among Trobriand Islanders?
- Explain “opium of the people”.
- Outline Tawney’s challenge to Weber.
- Name one example of religion causing political change.
Frequently asked questions
How do I bring interactionism into religion essays? The syllabus asks you to contrast structural and interactionist theories; use social constructionist definitions and the meaning religion has for believers as the interactionist angle.
Is Weber a Marxist? No. Weber accepted that economic factors matter but argued ideas — including religious ideas — can drive economic change.
What is the best evidence that religion can be radical? Liberation theology and the Iranian revolution are the clearest cases.
Related pages: religion and social order practice questions | influence of religion revision notes
Get free revision emails (optional)
Occasional emails with practice questions, worked explanations and links to free resources for the qualification and subjects you choose. No spam, and you can unsubscribe from any email. The free tools on this site never need an email.
Related resources
-
Study guides
Cambridge A-Level Sociology: Global Inequality, Migration and Crime (9699)
Cambridge 9699 Paper 4 sections 8.1-8.3 explained: globalisation and life chances, transnational bodies, causes and effects of migration, and global crime.
Sociology · Cambridge · A Level
Read guide -
Practice questions
Cambridge A-Level Sociology: Global Inequality, Migration and Crime — Practice Questions (9699)
Original 9699 Paper 4 style essays on globalisation and life chances, transnational aid, who gains from migration and global crime, with indicative content.
Sociology · Cambridge · A Level
Try questions -
Revision notes
Cambridge A-Level Sociology: Global Inequality, Migration and Crime — Revision Notes (9699)
Condensed Cambridge 9699 notes on sections 8.1-8.3: globalisation and life chances, aid and transnational bodies, migration push and pull, and global crime.
Sociology · Cambridge · A Level
Revise topic
Related articles
-
teaching
Sociology tuition online: GCSE, IGCSE, O Level and A Level
Which Sociology specifications Marlbridge teaches live online, how the papers are set out, where students usually lose marks, and how a trial class works.
9 October 2026
-
teaching
A Level tuition in Dubai: Cambridge or Pearson Edexcel International A Level?
Schools in Dubai and Abu Dhabi teach either Cambridge International AS & A Level or Pearson Edexcel International A Level. How the two are structured, why it matters for tuition, and how online classes from Lahore work.
9 October 2026
Studying this with a teacher
Working through Sociology A LEVEL?
This page is free and stays free. If you would rather be taught it, Marlbridge runs Sociology classes one-to-one and in small groups of up to 15, online in your own time zone. The first trial class is free. WhatsApp replies within an hour (8am–11pm Pakistan time, every day); email the same day.
Cambridge Sociology teachers at Marlbridge