Skip to content
Marlbridge

Study Guides

A Level Accounting: Investment appraisal (Cambridge 9706)

Payback, accounting rate of return, NPV and IRR, cash flows versus profits, and non-financial factors, for Cambridge A Level Accounting 9706 section 4.4.

Subject
Accounting
Level
A LEVEL
Topic
Cost and management accounting
Updated

Aligned to Cambridge A Level Accounting (9706), 2026-2028. Official specification .

Syllabus page (what it covers and how it is assessed): Cambridge A Level Accounting.

Syllabus points this page covers

9706 (A Level)

  • 4.4 Investment appraisal

Found an error? Report a correction.

Need help with this topic? Request a free trial class for A Level Accounting (9706).

This guide covers 4.4 Investment appraisal (4.4.1), A Level content within Topic 4, Cost and management accounting, for the Cambridge International AS & A Level Accounting 9706 syllabus for 2026, 2027 and 2028. All businesses and figures are invented and all amounts are in dollars. Practise on the practice questions, condense the ideas with the revision notes, and check your readiness with the free diagnostics. See also the course hub and the printable checklist.

What the syllabus asks for

4.4.1 point What you must be able to do
Future net cash inflows and outflows Identify the cash flows a project causes, and separate them from accounting profit
Payback Calculate and interpret
Accounting rate of return (ARR) Calculate using average profit divided by average investment, times 100
Net present value (NPV) Discount cash flows and interpret the result
Internal rate of return (IRR) Find by trial rates and interpolation, and interpret
Advantages and disadvantages Judge each technique
Investment decisions and recommendations Use the data to recommend, with reasons
Non-financial factors Explain how they affect the decision

The syllabus states that questions on discounted payback will not be set, and that questions involving a residual value at the end of a project will not be set. This guide leaves both out.

Cash flows, not profits

An investment appraisal asks whether spending money now is worth the cash it brings back later. The relevant items are the future net cash inflows and outflows caused by the project. Accounting profit is a different measure, because it follows the accruals concept.

Differences between profit and cash flow include:

  • Depreciation reduces profit but no cash leaves the business, so it is added back.
  • Buying the asset is a cash outflow at the start, yet it only reaches profit gradually as depreciation.
  • A share of existing head office costs charged to the project is not a new cash flow if those costs continue anyway.
  • Money already spent, such as a feasibility fee of 4,000 paid last month, cannot be recovered whichever way the decision goes, so it is left out.

Worked example 1. Oswick Printworks may buy a press for 90,000 (paid at the start, year 0). Its life is 3 years, with straight line depreciation and no residual value, so the charge is 90,000 / 3 = 30,000 a year. The forecast profits already deduct that depreciation and 5,000 a year of apportioned head office costs.

Year Profit Add back depreciation Add back apportioned costs Net cash inflow
1 7,000 30,000 5,000 42,000
2 13,000 30,000 5,000 48,000
3 16,000 30,000 5,000 51,000

The three inflows total 141,000, which is 51,000 more than the 90,000 outlay. The forecast profits total only 36,000, because depreciation and the apportioned costs are deducted in arriving at them.

Oswick Printworks: three stacked bars add profit, 30,000 depreciation and 5,000 apportioned costs to reach cash inflows of 42,000, 48,000 and 51,000. Inflows total 141,000 against an outlay of 90,000, while profits total only 36,000.
Depreciation and apportioned costs are deducted in profit but are not cash flows, so add them back.
Wexcombe Cider example. Counted: canning line, installation, sale of old fillers (year 0 outlay 216,000) and resale in year 5. Left out and crossed: depreciation, engineer fee, head-office share and loan interest, with a reason for each.
Include only future cash caused by the project; leave out depreciation, sunk costs, unchanged overheads and (OxfordAQA) loan interest.

Payback

Payback is the time taken for cumulative net cash inflows to repay the initial outlay. For even inflows, divide the outlay by the annual inflow. For uneven inflows, accumulate year by year and assume each year’s cash arrives evenly through the year.

For Oswick, cumulative inflow is 42,000 after year 1 and 90,000 after year 2, so payback is exactly 2 years.

Decision rule: accept if payback is within the business’s target period. If projects compete, the shorter payback is preferred.

Advantages Disadvantages
Simple to calculate and explain Ignores cash flows after the payback date
Favours quick return of cash, which helps liquidity Ignores the time value of money
Reduces exposure to forecasts far into the future The target period is a judgement, not a calculated figure
Bars show the running total of cash for the Kestrel press from -120 to +80 thousand pounds. The total crosses zero between years 2 and 3. 34,000 divided by 52,000 times 12 gives 7.8 months, so payback is 2 years 8 months.
Payback is when the running total of cash turns positive.

Accounting rate of return (ARR)

The syllabus formula is ARR = (average profit / average investment) × 100.

  • Average profit = total profit over the life of the project divided by the number of years. Total profit is total net cash inflows minus the cost of the asset (the cost of the asset is spread as depreciation).
  • Average investment = (initial investment + value at the end) / 2. With no residual value this is half the initial cost. Read how a question defines it.

Worked example 2. Tarnhaven Bottling is considering a filling line costing 120,000 with a 5-year life. Net cash inflows are 40,000, 45,000, 50,000, 35,000 and 30,000.

Total inflows 200,000, less cost 120,000, gives total profit of 80,000. Average profit = 80,000 / 5 = 16,000. Average investment = 120,000 / 2 = 60,000. ARR = 16,000 / 60,000 × 100 = 26.7%.

Decision rule: accept if ARR is at least the target return.

Advantages Disadvantages
Uses profit over the whole life Based on profit, not cash flow
Gives a percentage that is easy to compare with a target Ignores when profits arise
Links to profit measures managers already use A percentage hides the scale of the project
Total inflows of 200,000 less the 120,000 cost give 80,000 profit, or 16,000 a year over 5 years. The investment falls to nil over 5 years so the average is 60,000. ARR is 16,000 divided by 60,000, which is 26.7 percent.
ARR divides average yearly profit by average investment, which is half the cost with no residual value.
Tarnhaven net cash inflows of 40, 45, 50, 35 and 30 thousand total 200,000. Less the 120,000 cost, total profit is 80,000, so average profit is 16,000 and average investment 60,000. ARR is 26.7%.
ARR works from total inflows less cost, then divides average profit by average investment.
The same 25,000 average profit is shown as a slice of two bars: initial cost 240,000 gives 10.4% and average investment 135,000 gives 18.5%.
ARR changes with the investment base, so state which one you use.

Time value of money and net present value (NPV)

A dollar received next year is worth less than a dollar today, because cash today can be invested or used to repay finance, and because the future is uncertain. Discounting converts each future cash flow into its present value:

present value = cash flow × discount factor, where discount factor = 1 / (1 + r)ⁿ

Here r is the business’s cost of capital (the required rate of return) as a decimal and n is the year. Year 0 has a factor of 1. NPV is the sum of the present values, with the outlay shown as negative.

Worked example 3. Tarnhaven discounts at 10%.

Year Net cash flow Factor at 10% Present value
0 (120,000) 1.0000 (120,000)
1 40,000 0.9091 36,364
2 45,000 0.8264 37,188
3 50,000 0.7513 37,565
4 35,000 0.6830 23,905
5 30,000 0.6209 18,627
NPV 33,649

Decision rule: a positive NPV means the project earns more than the required return, so accept. A negative NPV means reject. Among projects that cannot all be done, the higher NPV adds more value.

Advantages Disadvantages
Recognises the time value of money Needs an estimated cost of capital
Uses all the cash flows More complex to calculate and explain
Gives a dollar value added Depends on forecasts that may prove wrong
Each year of Tarnhaven cash flow is shown beside its present value at 10 percent: 40,000 becomes 36,364, 45,000 becomes 37,188, 50,000 becomes 37,565, 35,000 becomes 23,905 and 30,000 becomes 18,627. These total 153,649, and after the 120,000 outlay the NPV is 33,649.
Later cash is worth less today, and a positive NPV means the project beats the required return.
A waterfall of Tarnhaven present values at 10%: outlay -120,000, then 36,364, 37,188, 37,565, 23,905 and 18,627, reaching an NPV of 33,649.
Each year is cash flow times its discount factor; year 0 stays at 1.0000.
Pairs of bars compare each cash flow with its present value after multiplying by 0.909, 0.826, 0.751 and 0.683. Present values total 155,754; less the 120,000 outlay gives NPV of 35,754.
Discounting turns later cash into smaller present values; NPV is their total less the outlay.
Two bars compare Wexcombe inflows added up (314,000) with the same inflows in today's money (210,969) against the 216,000 outlay. The discounted total is 5,031 short, so NPV is negative and the project is rejected.
A project can recover its cost undiscounted yet still have a negative NPV.

Internal rate of return (IRR)

The IRR is the discount rate at which NPV is zero. Calculate NPV at two rates, one giving a positive NPV and one a negative NPV, then interpolate:

IRR = lower rate + [NPV at lower rate / (NPV at lower rate − NPV at higher rate)] × (higher rate − lower rate)

Worked example 4. Using Tarnhaven’s cash flows with factors for 20% (0.8333, 0.6944, 0.5787, 0.4823, 0.4019) and 25% (0.8000, 0.6400, 0.5120, 0.4096, 0.3277), NPV is 2,452 at 20% and (9,433) at 25%.

IRR = 20 + [2,452 / (2,452 + 9,433)] × (25 − 20) = 20 + 1.03 = 21.0% (approximately).

Interpolation assumes NPV falls in a straight line between the two rates, so the answer is an estimate. Choose rates close together for a better one.

Decision rule: accept if the IRR is higher than the cost of capital. Here 21.0% exceeds 10%, which agrees with the positive NPV.

Advantages Disadvantages
Recognises the time value of money Interpolation only estimates the rate
A percentage compared directly with the cost of capital Does not show the dollar value added
Does not need the cost of capital to be fixed first Can rank projects differently from NPV
NPV falls as the discount rate rises: 33,649 at 10 percent, 2,452 at 20 percent and minus 9,433 at 25 percent. Joining the 20 and 25 percent points with a straight line crosses zero at about 21.0 percent, the IRR, above the 10 percent cost of capital.
The IRR is the rate at which NPV is zero; interpolation estimates it from two rates.
NPV against discount rate for Tarnhaven: 33,649 at 10%, 2,452 at 20% and -9,433 at 25%. The straight line between 20% and 25% crosses zero near 21.0%, the IRR estimate, above the 10% cost of capital.
IRR is the rate where NPV is zero, estimated by a straight line between two rates.
NPV falls as the discount rate rises. A straight line joins +34,060 at 10% and -4,555 at 16% and crosses zero at about 15.3%, above the 10% WACC, so the project is accepted.
IRR is the rate at which NPV is zero, estimated by interpolation and compared with WACC.

Making a recommendation

Techniques can disagree, so a recommendation needs a reasoned choice, not one calculation.

Worked example 5. Pellbrook Dairy must choose one of two machines. Each costs 80,000. Cost of capital is 10%.

Year Machine X inflow Machine Y inflow
1 50,000 10,000
2 40,000 40,000
3 20,000 75,000
Technique Machine X Machine Y Better
Payback 1.75 years 2.4 years X
ARR 25.0% 37.5% Y
NPV at 10% 13,537 18,495 Y
IRR (approx.) 20.9% 19.7% X

X returns cash faster, which suits a business short of liquidity. Y adds about 4,958 more value in present terms and has the higher ARR, but its cash comes later and is less certain. If cash is not tight, Y is the better choice because NPV measures the value added, and both IRRs are well above 10%. A different cash position or a high-risk forecast could justify X.

Machine X and Machine Y are compared on payback (1.75 and 2.4 years), ARR (25.0% and 37.5%), NPV at 10% (13,537 and 18,495) and IRR (20.9% and 19.7%). Payback and IRR favour X; ARR and NPV favour Y, which adds about 4,958 more value but later.
Techniques can disagree, so a recommendation needs a reasoned choice.
A grid of payback, ARR, NPV and IRR against four criteria: counts every year, uses cash, allows for time value, shows dollar value added. Only NPV has all four; payback answers in years, ARR and IRR in percent.
The four techniques differ in what they count and what they tell you.
Running totals for Alder and Birch cross zero at 2 years 6 months and 3 years 10 months. NPV bars at 8% show Alder 11,610 and Birch 17,545. Payback favours Alder, NPV favours Birch, and Birch relies on later years.
Payback and NPV can recommend different projects, so evaluate with both.

Non-financial factors

The numbers do not capture everything. Factors to weigh include:

  • Employees: redundancies, retraining, morale, or new jobs created.
  • Customers: quality, reliability and delivery times.
  • Environment: pollution, energy use and sustainability, which can affect reputation and law.
  • Suppliers and the local community.
  • Strategic fit, such as whether the project supports the long-term direction of the business.
  • Reliability of the forecasts, and the risk of changing technology.

A project with a positive NPV may be rejected because of its social or environmental effect. A project with a weak return may be accepted for strategic reasons. A balanced answer says which factors matter most here and why.

Six cards list employees, customers, environment, suppliers and community, strategic fit and forecast risk. A positive NPV project may be rejected for environmental harm and a weak-return project accepted for strategic fit.
Numbers can say yes while non-financial factors say no, so weigh both.

Common errors

  • Forgetting to add depreciation back when converting profit to cash flow.
  • Discounting the year 0 outlay, instead of leaving it at a factor of 1.
  • Using profit instead of cash flow in payback, NPV or IRR.
  • Dividing ARR by the full cost when the question defines average investment as half the cost.
  • Interpolating from two rates that both give positive NPVs.
  • Recommending from one technique alone, or giving a decision with no reason.

Frequently asked questions

Which investment appraisal methods are in Cambridge 9706 section 4.4? Section 4.4 covers payback, accounting rate of return (ARR), net present value (NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR), together with non-financial factors. The syllabus states that questions on discounted payback will not be set.

How do you calculate the accounting rate of return? ARR = (average profit ÷ average investment) × 100. Average profit is total profit over the project’s life divided by the number of years, and average investment is (initial investment + value at the end) ÷ 2.

How do you calculate IRR by interpolation? Calculate NPV at two rates, one giving a positive NPV and one negative, then IRR = lower rate + [NPV at lower rate ÷ (NPV at lower rate − NPV at higher rate)] × (higher rate − lower rate). The result is an estimate.

Why does investment appraisal use cash flows instead of profit? Depreciation reduces profit but no cash leaves the business, the asset purchase is a cash outflow at the start, and sunk costs and reallocated existing overheads are not new cash flows. Appraisal asks whether the cash spent now is worth the cash it brings back.

Can a project with a positive NPV be rejected? Yes. Non-financial factors such as effects on employees, customers, the environment, the community and strategic fit, or doubts about the forecasts, can outweigh a positive NPV.

Next, try the practice questions and use the revision notes to consolidate.

Official syllabus

Cambridge International, AS & A Level Accounting 9706 syllabus for 2026, 2027 and 2028, section 4.4 Investment appraisal.

Get free revision emails (optional)

Occasional emails with practice questions, worked explanations and links to free resources for the qualification and subjects you choose. No spam, and you can unsubscribe from any email. The free tools on this site never need an email.

Subjects (optional, up to 6)

Choose a qualification to see its subjects.

Related resources

Related articles

Studying this with a teacher

Working through Accounting A LEVEL?

This page is free and stays free. If you would rather be taught it, Marlbridge runs Accounting classes one-to-one and in small groups of up to 15, online in your own time zone. The first trial class is free. WhatsApp replies within an hour (8am–11pm Pakistan time, every day); email the same day.