Skip to content
Marlbridge

Revision Notes

A Level Accounting: Regulatory and ethical considerations (Cambridge 9706) – Revision Notes

Condensed recall notes on IAS 1, 2, 7, 8, 10, 16, 36, 37 and 38, ethics, audit and stewardship for Cambridge 9706 A Level Accounting.

Subject
Accounting
Level
A LEVEL
Topic
Financial accounting
Updated

Aligned to Cambridge A Level Accounting (9706), 2026-2028. Official specification .

Syllabus page (what it covers and how it is assessed): Cambridge A Level Accounting.

Syllabus points this page covers

9706 (A Level)

  • 3.2 Regulatory and ethical considerations

Found an error? Report a correction.

Need help with this topic? Request a free trial class for A Level Accounting (9706).

These notes condense section 3.2 Regulatory and ethical considerations of the Cambridge International AS & A Level Accounting 9706 syllabus for 2026, 2027 and 2028 (A Level content). For explanations and worked examples, read the study guide first. Then attempt the practice questions. Other links: course hub, checklist, diagnostics, and non-current assets for depreciation methods. Amounts are in dollars.

Standards at a glance (3.2.1)

Standard One-line recall Key test or formula
IAS 1 Fair presentation, going concern, accrual basis, consistency, materiality Complete set has five parts: financial position, profit or loss and other comprehensive income, changes in equity, cash flows, notes
IAS 2 Inventories at the lower of cost and NRV NRV = selling price − costs to complete and sell; FIFO or weighted average; no LIFO
IAS 7 Cash flows grouped as operating, investing, financing Operating: direct or indirect method; non-cash deals excluded
IAS 8 Policies consistent; estimates; errors Policy change: retrospective. Estimate: prospective. Prior period error: restate comparatives
IAS 10 Events after the reporting period Adjusting: change figures. Non-adjusting: disclose if material
IAS 16 Property, plant and equipment Cost model or revaluation model; depreciate over useful life; review life and residual value
IAS 36 Impairment Recoverable amount = higher of fair value less costs of disposal and value in use
IAS 37 Provisions and contingencies Provision: obligation, probable, reliable estimate
IAS 38 Intangible assets Research expensed; development capitalised if criteria met; no internally generated goodwill
Three lanes. A provision needs a present obligation from a past event, a probable outflow and a reliable estimate; if all three are met it is recognised. A contingent liability, a possible obligation or one that is not probable or not measurable, is disclosed in the notes; if the outflow is remote nothing is shown. A contingent asset is disclosed when the inflow is probable and recognised only when realisation is virtually certain.
A provision is recognised, a contingent liability is disclosed, and a contingent asset is recognised only when virtually certain.
A waterfall of cash for the year. The company started with an overdraft of 14,600 dollars (negative cash). Operating activities added 192,900, investing used 163,000 and financing used 11,000, a net increase of 18,900, leaving closing cash and cash equivalents of 4,300 dollars.
Operating, investing and financing flows move opening cash (an overdraft) to closing cash.

Method boxes

Inventory valuation (IAS 2)

  1. Take cost for each item or group of similar items.
  2. Work out NRV: expected selling price less costs still to be incurred.
  3. Use the lower figure for each.
  4. Total them. Charge any write-down as an expense.

Impairment test (IAS 36)

  1. Carrying amount at the date of the test.
  2. Fair value less costs of disposal.
  3. Value in use.
  4. Recoverable amount is the higher of steps 2 and 3.
  5. If carrying amount is higher, the difference is the impairment loss.

Event after the reporting period (IAS 10)

  1. Ask: did the event give new evidence about a condition that existed at the reporting date?
  2. Yes: adjusting, so change the figures.
  3. No, it arose afterwards: non-adjusting, so disclose if material.
  4. Dividends declared after the date are never a liability at the date.

Contingencies (IAS 37)

Probability of outflow or inflow Liability Asset
Virtually certain Provision Recognise as an asset
Probable Provision if reliably measurable Disclose only
Possible Disclose No disclosure needed
Remote Nothing Nothing

Small worked reminders

  • Inventory costing 8,400 with NRV 7,650 is carried at 7,650. Write-down is 750.
  • An asset with carrying amount 300,000, fair value 210,000, disposal costs 10,000 and value in use 185,000: fair value less costs of disposal 200,000 is higher, so recoverable amount is 200,000 and the impairment loss is 100,000.
  • Machine price 95,000 plus installation 5,000, residual value 10,000, life 6 years: cost 100,000, depreciation (100,000 − 10,000) ÷ 6 = 15,000 a year.
  • A 72,000 development asset with a 6-year life, available for use on 1 May, has amortisation of 12,000 × 8/12 = 8,000 in a year ending 31 December.
  • Cost 60,000, residual value 5,000, 5-year life, so 11,000 a year. After 2 years, carrying amount is 38,000. A revised remaining life of 2 years gives (38,000 − 5,000) ÷ 2 = 16,500 a year from then, with no restatement.

Cash flow groups and IAS 1 features

Statement of cash flows group Examples
Operating Cash received from customers, cash paid to suppliers and employees
Investing Buying or selling non-current assets, buying shares in another company
Financing Issuing shares, taking out or repaying loans

Non-cash deals, such as shares issued in exchange for a building, are not cash flows and are left out.

IAS 1 feature What it means in practice
Fair presentation Statements reflect what happened, applying the standards
Going concern Assets and liabilities are valued as if trading continues
Accrual basis Items are recognised when earned or incurred, not when cash moves
Consistency Same presentation and classification year to year
Materiality Separate items that could influence users’ decisions
Comparative information Prior year figures shown beside the current year
A table builds up the cost of a frame-welding line. Included, with running totals: purchase price 180,000, import duty 9,000 (189,000), delivery 4,000 (193,000), installation 7,500 (200,500), testing 3,500 (204,000) and an estimate of removal costs 12,000 (216,000). Staff training 2,500 and head office administration 6,000 are crossed out and treated as expenses. With residual value 8,000 and a ten year life, annual depreciation is 20,800.
Only costs needed to bring the asset into use are added; training and head office administration are expensed.
Three bars for a mixing plant. Carrying amount 640,000 dollars. Fair value 500,000 less 20,000 disposal costs gives 480,000. Value in use is 455,000. The recoverable amount is the higher of the last two, 480,000, shown by a dashed line. The part of the carrying amount above it, 160,000, is the impairment loss charged to profit or loss. Depreciation then runs on 480,000, for example 60,000 a year over 8 years.
An asset is written down to the higher of fair value less costs of disposal and value in use.
A timeline starts at the reporting date. Three events follow. A customer owing 18,400 dollars goes into liquidation: adjusting, because the debt was already doubtful at the reporting date. Inventory costing 31,000 is sold for 22,500, so net realisable value was below cost: adjusting, a write-down of 8,500. A fire destroys a store: non-adjusting, so only a note. Adjusting events total 26,900, so draft profit of 412,000 becomes 385,100.
Adjusting events change the figures; non-adjusting events are only disclosed.
A bar for Oakhanger Plastics shows spending in order: research 135,000 dollars and early development 48,000 before feasibility could be shown, together 183,000, are expensed. Later development of 210,000 met every capitalisation criterion and is recognised as an intangible asset. With a five year life, amortisation is 42,000 a year.
Research and early development are expensed; later development that meets every criterion becomes an asset.
Tarnholt Ceramics values three product lines at the lower of cost and net realisable value (NRV). Mugs cost 14,000 and have NRV 15,000, so 14,000 is used. Vases cost 22,000 but NRV is 21,000 (26,000 less 5,000 costs to sell), so 21,000 is used and 1,000 is written off as an expense. Tiles cost and NRV are both 9,600. Inventories are 44,600 against a cost total of 45,600.
Vases are written down by 1,000 because NRV is below cost.
Quarrenby Foods bought a machine for 90,000 with residual value 6,000 and a 7 year life, giving 12,000 a year. After 3 years the carrying amount is 54,000. Management now expects 3 more years of use, so depreciation from now is (54,000 minus 6,000) divided by 3, which is 16,000 a year. The first three years are not restated. A material prior period error is different: the comparatives are restated.
A change in estimate applies from now on, while a prior period error restates comparatives.
Three stock lines each show cost and NRV bars with a tick on the lower. Desk lamps use cost (2,160 against 3,360); floor lamps use NRV (1,360 against 1,800); lampshades use NRV (900 against 1,200). Item by item gives 4,420; comparing totals would keep 5,160 and hide a 740 loss.
Stock is valued at the lower of cost and NRV for each item, not on the totals.

Applying a standard in an answer

  1. Name the standard and state the rule in one sentence.
  2. Apply it to the figures in the question. Show the comparison, such as cost against NRV.
  3. State the accounting entry or the effect on profit, assets or liabilities.
  4. Say what the result means for users, such as lower profit or an extra note.

Ethics (3.2.2)

Principle Remember it as Typical breach
Integrity Honest and straightforward Reporting figures you know are false
Objectivity Free from bias and pressure Auditing a business owned by a relative
Professional competence and due care Skilled, up to date, careful Applying a standard you have not studied
Confidentiality Do not disclose or use information Passing client data to a friend
Professional behaviour Obey laws, protect the profession’s name Helping to hide tax liabilities
  • Need for a framework: rules cannot cover every case, users depend on trust, and the profession’s reputation is at stake.
  • Stakeholder effects: investors, lenders, employees, tax authority, suppliers, customers and the business itself.
  • Social implications: staff and community (closures), environment, honesty about risks, use of local suppliers.
Five cards show the principles with an icon and an example breach: integrity (signing off misleading figures), objectivity (choosing an estimate to lift your bonus), professional competence and due care (unchecked tax rules), confidentiality (telling a friend a client’s takeover plans) and professional behaviour (exaggerating qualifications).
Each principle has a typical way of being broken.
A waterfall from draft profit 41,600 to 51,040: switching depreciation method adds 2,520 (breaks consistency), cutting the debt allowance adds 2,720 (breaks prudence) and recording an undelivered order adds 4,200 (breaks realisation). Profit is overstated by 9,440.
Three convenient changes lift profit by $9,440 and each breaks an accounting concept.

Audit and stewardship (3.2.3)

Point Detail
Stewardship Directors manage the company for shareholders: safeguard assets, keep records, prepare statements, report
True and fair view Statements present position, performance and changes fairly, free of material misstatement
Auditor’s role Independent opinion on the statements; not preparing them; not a guarantee against fraud
External audit Appointed by shareholders, independent, reports to them on the statements
Internal audit Within the business, reports to management, reviews controls and efficiency
Unqualified report Statements give a true and fair view
Qualified report True and fair view “except for” a material matter or missing evidence
Two columns compare the audits. External audit: shareholders appoint an auditor who is independent of the company; the auditor does not prepare the accounts, and gives an opinion on whether they give a true and fair view; the report goes to shareholders and is often required by law. The outcome is an unqualified report (true and fair) or a qualified report (true and fair except for a stated matter). Internal audit: directors or management appoint an employee or outsourced auditor who reviews controls, risks and efficiency and reports to directors; it is usually a choice.
External and internal audit differ in who appoints, who reports and what is reviewed.
Shareholders appoint the board and the external auditors; auditors report back to shareholders. The board has a chair and a CEO who are different people, plus independent non-executive directors. Audit and remuneration committees, made of independent NEDs, sit below; the remuneration committee sets directors’ pay. AQA only: comply or explain.
Independent checks stop directors from marking their own homework.
A question chain: enough evidence? If not, disclaimer. Material misstatement? If not, unmodified. Pervasive? If not, qualified (except for); if so, adverse. An OxfordAQA example shows 85,000 left out of 940,000 profit before tax, 9.0 percent, material but not pervasive, so qualified.
Three questions decide which of the four audit opinions is given.

Evaluation points to have ready

  • Strengths of standards: comparability between businesses, consistency over time, more reliable information for investors and lenders.
  • Limits of standards: they still need judgement, such as estimating NRV or value in use, so profit can be influenced.
  • Value of an unqualified report: it gives shareholders independent assurance, but it is not a guarantee that the figures are exact or that fraud is absent.
  • Value of internal audit: it can find weaknesses early, but it is less independent because it reports within the business.
  • Ethical pressure: the cost of resisting is lost bonuses or a strained relationship with a director, against the longer-term cost of lost trust and penalties.

Must-know distinctions

  • Change in policy (retrospective) versus change in estimate (prospective).
  • Adjusting versus non-adjusting events.
  • Provision (recognised) versus contingent liability (disclosed) versus contingent asset (disclosed only if probable).
  • Research (expense) versus development (asset if criteria met).
  • Impairment (fall in recoverable amount) versus depreciation (systematic spread of cost).
  • External versus internal audit.

Quick self-test

  1. On what basis are financial statements prepared unless the business will cease trading?
  2. Inventory has cost 8,400 and NRV 7,650. At what amount is it shown?
  3. Name the cost flow method that IAS 2 does not permit.
  4. In which group of the statement of cash flows is cash paid for new machinery?
  5. How is a change in accounting estimate treated, compared with a change in accounting policy?
  6. A dividend is declared after the reporting date. Is it a liability at that date?
  7. Carrying amount 300,000; fair value 210,000; disposal costs 10,000; value in use 185,000. Calculate the impairment loss.
  8. Price 95,000, installation 5,000, residual value 10,000, life 6 years. Calculate annual depreciation.
  9. State the five fundamental ethical principles.
  10. What is the difference between a qualified and an unqualified audit report?
  11. Who appoints the external auditor, and to whom does the auditor report?

Answers

  1. Going concern.
  2. 7,650 (write-down 750).
  3. LIFO.
  4. Investing.
  5. Estimate: applied from now with no restatement. Policy: applied retrospectively.
  6. No, it is a non-adjusting event.
  7. Recoverable amount 200,000, so loss 100,000.
  8. 15,000.
  9. Integrity, objectivity, professional competence and due care, confidentiality, professional behaviour.
  10. Unqualified: true and fair view. Qualified: true and fair view except for a stated matter.
  11. The shareholders appoint; the auditor reports to them.

Where marks are usually lost

  • Valuing inventory at cost or at selling price instead of the lower of cost and NRV.
  • Forgetting costs to complete and sell when working out NRV.
  • Restating past years for a change in estimate.
  • Calling a post-year-end event adjusting without linking it to a condition at the reporting date.
  • Creating a provision for a possible obligation that is not probable.
  • Naming an ethical principle without applying it to the scenario.
  • Describing the auditor as responsible for preparing the accounts.
  • Giving a one-sided answer to an evaluation question without a justified conclusion.

Frequently asked questions

What does stewardship mean for company directors? Stewardship is the duty of directors to look after the company’s resources on behalf of the shareholders: act in their best interests, safeguard assets, keep proper accounting records, prepare financial statements that give a true and fair view and report to shareholders.

Does a change in accounting estimate restate past years? No. Under IAS 8, a change in estimate, such as a revised useful life, is applied from now on; restating past years for a change in estimate is a common mistake.

When must a provision be made under IAS 37? A provision is made when there is a present obligation, an outflow is probable and the amount can be reliably estimated. A possible obligation that is not probable does not get a provision.

Is the auditor responsible for preparing the accounts? No. The directors prepare the financial statements; the auditor examines them independently and gives an opinion on whether they show a true and fair view. An audit report is not a guarantee of accuracy.

Official syllabus

Cambridge International, AS & A Level Accounting 9706 syllabus for 2026, 2027 and 2028, section 3.2.

Get free revision emails (optional)

Occasional emails with practice questions, worked explanations and links to free resources for the qualification and subjects you choose. No spam, and you can unsubscribe from any email. The free tools on this site never need an email.

Subjects (optional, up to 6)

Choose a qualification to see its subjects.

Related resources

Related articles

Studying this with a teacher

Working through Accounting A LEVEL?

This page is free and stays free. If you would rather be taught it, Marlbridge runs Accounting classes one-to-one and in small groups of up to 15, online in your own time zone. The first trial class is free. WhatsApp replies within an hour (8am–11pm Pakistan time, every day); email the same day.