Skip to content
Marlbridge

Study Guides

IGCSE Business: Business and ethical issues and Pressure groups (Cambridge 0264)

Study guide to ethical issues, how businesses respond, the pros and cons of being ethical and pressure groups, for Cambridge IGCSE Business 0264.

Subject
Business
Level
IGCSE
Topic
External influences on business activity
Updated

Aligned to Cambridge IGCSE Business (0264), For examination in 2027, 2028 and 2029. Official specification .

Syllabus page (what it covers and how it is assessed): Cambridge IGCSE Business.

Syllabus points this page covers

0264

  • 6.4 Business and ethical issues
  • 6.5 Pressure groups

Found an error? Report a correction.

Need help with this topic? Request a free trial class for IGCSE Business (0450 / 0264).

This guide covers sections 6.4 (Business and ethical issues) and 6.5 (Pressure groups) of the Cambridge IGCSE Business 0264 syllabus for examination in 2027, 2028 and 2029. Questions on both papers are based on all the subject content, so this topic can appear in a short answer, a data response or the case study. Use it with the revision notes and the practice questions. The course hub, the printable checklist and the free diagnostics show what to do next.

All businesses, groups and figures below are invented. Money is in dollars, and amounts are written as plain numbers.

What this guide covers

Syllabus point What you must be able to do
6.4.1 Ethical issues which may affect businesses Recognise issues such as child labour, paying fair wages to employees, paying fair prices to suppliers and using suppliers who do not damage the environment
6.4.1 How businesses may respond Describe and explain the actions a business can take
6.4.1 Advantages and disadvantages of a business being ethical Weigh the benefits against the costs
6.5.1 The role of pressure groups Explain how pressure groups can influence business decisions

The syllabus gives these as examples, so a case study may present another ethical issue. The method is the same: name the issue, say who is affected, then say how the business could respond and what that would cost and gain.

Related pages: legal controls show where the law ends and ethical choice begins, and business and the international economy covers multinational companies, whose supply chains often raise ethical questions.

6.4.1 Ethical issues

An ethical issue is a situation where a business must choose between what is right and what is cheapest or most profitable. This is a standard way of putting it, not a quotation. An ethical choice goes beyond what the law requires, although in some places the law already forbids the worst practices.

The four examples in the syllabus are:

  • Child labour. Children are employed in work that is unsuitable for their age or that stops them going to school. A business may not employ children itself, yet it can still be linked to the practice if one of its suppliers does.
  • Paying fair wages to employees. A wage is fair if it reflects the work done and lets the employee live decently. A business can pay the lowest wage it can find, or it can pay more.
  • Paying fair prices to suppliers. A large buyer can force a small supplier to accept a price that barely covers the supplier’s costs. A fair price lets the supplier pay its own workers properly and stay in business.
  • Using suppliers who do not damage the environment. A business may choose a cheaper supplier whose factory pollutes, or a dearer one that uses cleaner methods. The business is then partly responsible for the damage. The environmental effects of a business’s own activity are covered in section 6.3.

Ethical issues affect different stakeholders. Employees, suppliers, customers, the local community and owners can all gain or lose from the same decision.

Worked example 1: a fair wage

Hallowfen Garments makes 200,000 shirts a year and sells them at 9 each. It currently pays 0.90 in wages per shirt. Other variable costs are 3.10 per shirt. Fixed costs are 400,000 a year. Campaigners say the wage is too low to live on, and the owner considers raising it to 1.20 per shirt.

Step 1: sales revenue = 200,000 × 9 = 1,800,000.

Step 2: current profit = 1,800,000 − (0.90 + 3.10) × 200,000 − 400,000 = 1,800,000 − 800,000 − 400,000 = 600,000.

Step 3: the wage rise is 0.30 per shirt, which is 33.3% more. Extra wage cost = 0.30 × 200,000 = 60,000.

Step 4: new profit = 600,000 − 60,000 = 540,000, a fall of 10%. Profit as a percentage of sales revenue falls from 33.3% to 30.0%.

Step 5: Hallowfen could raise the price by 3% to 9.27. If sales stay at 200,000 shirts, extra revenue is 54,000 and profit is 594,000. The risk is that some customers buy elsewhere at the higher price.

The decision is not just arithmetic. Better-paid machinists may stay longer, so recruitment costs may fall. The owner must weigh a certain cost of 60,000 against benefits that are harder to measure.

Profit falls from 600,000 to 540,000 dollars (10 percent) after a 0.30 dollar wage rise on 200,000 shirts. A 3 percent price rise to 9.27 dollars adds 54,000 dollars if sales hold, giving 594,000.
A fair wage costs $60,000 a year; a price rise can win most of it back if customers stay.
Four cards: child labour (children at work, not at school), fair wages, fair supplier prices, and clean suppliers. An ethical choice goes beyond what the law requires.
The four ethical issues named in the syllabus.
Each issue points to a response and its cost: check suppliers, pay higher wages, pay fair prices, change to ethical suppliers. The legal minimum is the lowest-cost option; a written policy, telling customers and answering complaints are other responses.
Match the response to the issue in the question, and state its cost.
Three bands: ethics (a choice: charitable giving, fair prices to suppliers, religious observance) above a line marking the legal minimum; law (a requirement: safe workplace, national minimum wage, consumer protection); and breaking the law, which brings consequences of non-compliance.
Law is what a business must do; ethics is what it chooses to do beyond that.

How businesses may respond to ethical issues

A business can respond in several ways. The best answer matches the response to the issue in the question.

Response What it involves Likely effect
Do the legal minimum only Obey the law and go no further Lowest cost, but the business is open to criticism
Adopt a written ethical policy Set rules on wages, working conditions and sourcing Gives staff and managers clear guidance
Check suppliers Inspect suppliers and drop those that break the policy Cuts the risk of child labour or pollution in the supply chain, but costs time and money
Pay higher wages Raise pay above the minimum it could get away with Higher labour cost, better motivation
Pay fair prices to suppliers Agree prices that cover the supplier’s costs Higher material cost, more reliable supply
Change to ethical suppliers or materials Switch to suppliers who meet the policy May raise costs, may open the way to ethical promotion
Tell customers Publicise the policy in labels and advertising Builds reputation, but claims must be true
Respond to complaints Meet a pressure group, explain, or change practice Protects reputation

A business can also ignore the issue or deny it. That can save money in the short run. It can also lead to bad publicity, a loss of customers and pressure from groups outside the business.

Worked example 2: a fair price to a supplier

Brindlewick Nuts buys 150 tonnes of cashews a year from a small farming cooperative at 2,000 a tonne. The cooperative says the price does not cover its costs, and Brindlewick agrees to pay 2,300 a tonne. It sells 300,000 packs a year at 4.50 each. Variable cost is 2.70 per pack, including the cashews.

Step 1: old cashew cost = 150 × 2,000 = 300,000, which is 1.00 per pack.

Step 2: new cashew cost = 150 × 2,300 = 345,000, which is 1.15 per pack. The extra cost is 45,000, a rise of 15%.

Step 3: contribution per pack falls from 4.50 − 2.70 = 1.80 to 1.65.

Step 4: total contribution was 300,000 × 1.80 = 540,000. To earn the same, Brindlewick needs 540,000 ÷ 1.65 = 327,273 packs. That is about 9.1% more sales.

Brindlewick could try to win these sales by telling customers its cashews are bought at fair prices. If customers do not respond, profit falls by 45,000. A fair price may also make supply more reliable, because the cooperative is more likely to keep trading.

Cashew cost per pack rises from 1.00 to 1.15 dollars so contribution falls from 1.80 to 1.65. Earning the same 540,000 dollars needs 327,273 packs, about 9.1 percent more sales; if customers do not respond, profit falls by 45,000.
A fairer price to the cooperative needs about 9.1% more sales to earn the same contribution.

Advantages and disadvantages of being ethical

Advantages Disadvantages
Better reputation, which may increase sales Higher costs, such as wages and supplier prices
Customers who care about ethics may be more loyal Higher prices may lose price-sensitive customers
Employees may be more motivated and stay longer Lower profit, at least in the short run
Easier to recruit good staff Time and cost of checking suppliers
Less risk of bad publicity and of campaigns against the business Less ethical rivals may keep their costs and prices lower
Suppliers may be more reliable and co-operative Benefits may be slow or hard to prove
Possibly a higher price for an ethical product A claim that turns out to be untrue can damage reputation

Which side wins depends on the business. A well-known clothing label has more to lose from a scandal. A business selling a basic product to customers who only look at price may find the costs of being ethical hard to recover. For a “justify” or “consider” question, state the effect, say how large it could be, and reach a judgement.

A level balance scale with a question mark on the pivot: coins on the left for higher costs and lower margin, heart, star and box on the right for loyalty, reputation and reliable supply. The judgement depends on whether customers value it enough.
Ethical action has a cost and a benefit, and the judgement depends on the business and its customers.

6.5.1 The role of pressure groups

A pressure group is an organised group of people who campaign to influence the decisions of businesses or governments. This is the usual definition and not a quotation from the syllabus. The groups may campaign for the environment, workers’ rights, consumers or a local community. Their members are usually not owners or employees of the business they target.

A pressure group can influence a business by:

  • publicising its concerns through newspapers, television and social media, so that the public hears about the issue
  • asking customers to stop buying from the business (a boycott), or to choose a rival
  • organising petitions and protests, which draw attention and can be filmed and shared
  • lobbying the government to change the law, which then changes what every business in the market must do (see legal controls for how law shapes decisions)
  • meeting managers to negotiate changes, and then recognising the business when it improves

Pressure groups do not only attack. A group may praise a business which improves its practice, and that praise can be used in promotion.

How much influence a group has depends on:

  • how much support it has from the public and the media
  • how much the business depends on its reputation, since a well-known brand has more to lose
  • whether customers can easily switch to a rival
  • whether the demands are affordable and clear
  • whether the group can cause a loss of sales or a change in the law

A pressure group has no power to force a business to change. It works by affecting the things that matter to the business: sales, reputation and the law.

Worked example 3: a campaign against a dye works

Riverbank Watch is a local group. It says that Vessarine Dyeworks, which makes fabric dye, is pouring waste into a river. It begins a social media campaign and asks people to boycott fabrics made with Vessarine dyes.

Vessarine has sales revenue of 2,500,000 a year and earns a contribution of 40% on each sale. It expects the boycott to cut sales by 12%.

Step 1: lost revenue = 12% × 2,500,000 = 300,000.

Step 2: lost contribution = 40% × 300,000 = 120,000 a year.

Step 3: a filter system would cost 90,000 and last five years, which is 18,000 a year, plus 5,000 a year in running costs. The yearly cost is 23,000.

The cost of responding (23,000 a year) is much smaller than the lost contribution (120,000 a year) if the boycott lasts. The business also avoids the risk that the group asks the government to tighten the law. Against this, the boycott might fade, or the campaign may not reach Vessarine’s customers. A sensible judgement is that Vessarine should respond, and should tell people what it has done.

Five routes join a pressure group to a business: publicity, boycott, petitions and protests, lobbying for a new law, and meeting managers. They act on sales, reputation and the law. A pressure group can only influence.
Pressure groups act on a business through sales, reputation and the law.
If the boycott lasts, Vessarine loses 120,000 dollars of contribution a year. A filter costs 18,000 plus 5,000 running, 23,000 dollars a year. Responding costs about a fifth of the loss.
If the boycott lasts, responding ($23,000) costs far less than the lost contribution ($120,000).
Five wedges widen from weak to strong influence: support from the public and media, how much the business relies on its reputation, how easily customers can switch, whether demands are affordable and clear, and whether the group can cut sales or change the law.
Five factors decide how much influence a pressure group has.

Common errors

  • Saying a business must be ethical because the law says so. Ethics goes beyond the law.
  • Writing only that being ethical is “good for the image”. Say why: more customers, more loyalty, fewer campaigns.
  • Giving only advantages. For a “justify” question, weigh costs as well.
  • Saying a pressure group can close a business down or force it to act. It can only influence.
  • Forgetting the stimulus. Use the product, country and figures in the case study.

Next steps

Test yourself with the practice questions, then recheck the facts in the revision notes. The free diagnostics show which other topics need work.

Frequently asked questions

What ethical issues are named in the IGCSE Business 0264 syllabus? The syllabus gives four examples: child labour, paying fair wages to employees, paying fair prices to suppliers, and using suppliers who do not damage the environment. A case study may present another ethical issue.

What are the advantages and disadvantages of being ethical? Being ethical can improve reputation, raise sales and build customer loyalty. It can also raise costs, such as wages and supplier prices, and higher prices may lose price-sensitive customers.

What is a pressure group? A pressure group is an organized group of people who campaign to influence the decisions of businesses or government. Groups can also praise businesses that improve their practices.

What is a boycott? A boycott is when a pressure group asks customers to stop buying from a business, or to choose a rival instead, in order to pressure it into changing.

Official syllabus

Cambridge IGCSE Business 0264 syllabus for examination in 2027, 2028 and 2029, published by Cambridge International, sections 6.4 and 6.5.

Get free revision emails (optional)

Occasional emails with practice questions, worked explanations and links to free resources for the qualification and subjects you choose. No spam, and you can unsubscribe from any email. The free tools on this site never need an email.

Subjects (optional, up to 6)

Choose a qualification to see its subjects.

Related resources

Related articles

Studying this with a teacher

Working through Business IGCSE?

This page is free and stays free. If you would rather be taught it, Marlbridge runs Business classes one-to-one and in small groups of up to 15, online in your own time zone. The first trial class is free. WhatsApp replies within an hour (8am–11pm Pakistan time, every day); email the same day.